STAR-K Kosher Certification
Legal name: Star-k Certification Inc
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 520566794
- IRS 990 coverage
- 2010–2024
- Official website data refreshed
- Sep 2026
- Forms available
- Form 990 2024, Form 990-T 2024
- Location
- Baltimore, MD, United States
- Phone
- 410-484-4110
- Rating
- 62
- Verdict
- SUPPORTED
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Judaism
- Affiliation
- Judaism
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $19,147,657
- Expenses
- $17,030,306
- Assets
- $18,080,095
- Liabilities
- $1,920,732
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
12 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- AVROM POLLAK (President)
Highest reported compensation
- AVROM POLLAK (President): $339,519 total reported compensation
- RABBI MOSHE HEINEMANN (Director): $290,084 total reported compensation
- RABBI JONAH GEWIRTZ (Director): $267,760 total reported compensation
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
STAR-K Certification is a nonprofit kosher certification agency chartered in 1947 that certifies food products, appliances, establishments, and industrial food chemicals, with offices beyond its Baltimore headquarters (including dedicated staff in multiple countries). About Us Leadership The STAR-K Advantage Why Choose STAR-K Our Sacred Mission Testimonials STAR-D STAR-S Apply for STAR-K Certification About Us STAR-K Certification, Inc., chartered in 1947 as the Orthodox Jewish Council/Vaad Hakashrus of Baltimore, is a nonprofit 501(c)3 agency considered one of the most trusted and respected kosher certification organizations by kosher consumers and kosher organizations, alike. Our status as a non-profit organization helps us avoid conflicts of interest that might compromise our high kashrus standards, and is the underpinning of that trust.
What it reported doing in 2024
Serve millions of kosher food consumers internationally; we are a resource center for thousands of technical inquiries regarding kosher and related laws.Publish newsletter: Kashrus Kurrents
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Earned-program. 98% of the money available for current operations came from fees and other program revenue.
- Distribution model
- Direct operator. The filing allocates 97% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
The verdict
SUPPORTED - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and program spending has grown recently. A relatively small share of voting board members are independent and some filing-based governance responses are negative or unanswered.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 80
- Transparency & Controls: 58
- Accountability: 22
- Sustainability: 54
- Growth: 100
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 87.1%; rating input score 87
- Program expense ratio: 95.2%; rating input score 95
- Fundraising efficiency: $0 raised per $1 spent on fundraising; rating input score 0; 0th percentile among comparable filings
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 92.3%; rating input score 92; 8th percentile among comparable filings
- Pay-setting controls: 2 of 6 controls in place; rating input score 33
- Compensation committee: Pass
- Independent consultant: Missing
- Other Form 990s reviewed: Missing
- Written employment contract: Missing
- Compensation survey or study: Missing
- Board or committee approval: Pass
- Foreign activity oversight: Scored; rating input score 0
- Grant itemization coverage: 88.1%; rating input score 88; 19th percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Limited
- Related-party transparency: Limited
Accountability
- Independent voting board: 28.6%; rating input score 29; 7th percentile among comparable filings
- Governance controls: 1 of 8 controls in place; rating input score 12
- Conflict-of-interest policy: Fail
- Whistleblower policy: Fail
- Document-retention policy: Fail
- CEO compensation review process: Fail
- Other executive compensation review process: NotApplicable
- Form 990 shared with the board: Fail
- Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
- Audit committee oversight: Missing
- Independent financial-statement audit: Fail
Sustainability
- Operating margin: 11.1%; rating input score 70; 70th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 1.06; rating input score 38; 38th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.11; rating input score 73; 73rd percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 14.6%; rating input score 9; 9th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: 5.9% per year; rating input score 100; 48th percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: 6.6% per year; rating input score 100; 57th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 8.2% per year; rating input score 100; 56th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- What they do: 1 programs and campaigns described on the official site · 1 operating location identified
- Where the money goes: 87.1% of revenue deployed · 95.2% of spending went to programs
- Governance: 2 of 7 board members independent · 1 of 8 filing controls reported
- Programs: 1 filed program accomplishment · $16.2M in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $340K · 12 people listed · 2 of 6 pay-setting controls reported
- Consistency: 27 of 28 current checks pass · 1 finding to review
- Schedules: 8 filed schedules · includes foreign activity, grants, and executive pay
- Filing history: 14 filing years from 2010 to 2024
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: 30 filed money-flow records
- Related organizations: 19 filed related-organization links
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- High — Accountability: Independent voting board scored 29/100.
- High — Accountability: Governance controls: 6 of 7 not reported.
- High — Transparency & Controls: Foreign activity oversight scored 0/100.
- High — Financial Efficiency: Fundraising efficiency scored 0/100.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 38/100.
- High — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 9/100.
- Review — Transparency & Controls: Domestic grant itemization did not reconcile in the filed values.