Stanita Foundation
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 346555963
- IRS 990 coverage
- 2013–2025
- Forms available
- Form 990 2025
- Location
- Greenwood, IN, USA
- Phone
- 3178883333
- Rating
- 83
- Verdict
- STRONG
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Named Trusts N.E.C.
- Affiliation
- Christianity
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $4,892,748
- Expenses
- $4,892,748
- Assets
- $39,544,102
- Liabilities
- $0
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
4 people listed
Highest reported compensation
- JOEL T OVERTON (TRUSTEE): $136,353 total reported compensation
- JEFF EDWARDS (CHAIRMAN): $125,640 total reported compensation
- CHRIS WILLIAMS (TRUSTEE): $120,067 total reported compensation
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
Supporting organization of one mission society USA, inc. (oms). Oms is exempt under irc section 501(c)(3). Oms exists to plant churches around the world.
What it reported doing in 2025
To support one mission society's disciple making and church multiplication ministries in 61 countries with over 100 ministry partners. This work is accomplished through two training streams train and multiply and village church planting which equip local disciples to evangelize, disciple, lead bible studies, and form new churches. In calendar year 2025, ministry results included 509,294 decisions to follow christ, 279,364 people baptized, and 14,881 new worshipping groups formed.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Investment-supported. 100% of the money available for current operations came from recurring investment income.
- Distribution model
- Grant intermediary. The nonprofit sent 100% of its reported program spending out as grants.
The verdict
STRONG - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. A relatively small share of voting board members are independent and some filing-based governance responses are negative or unanswered.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 89
- Transparency & Controls: 100
- Accountability: 49
- Sustainability: 58
- Growth: 100
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 100%; rating input score 100
- Program expense ratio: 100%; rating input score 100
- Fundraising efficiency: Limited
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
- Pay-setting controls: Limited
- Foreign activity oversight: Limited
- Grant itemization coverage: 100%; rating input score 100; 75th percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Limited
- Related-party transparency: Yes; rating input score 100
Accountability
- Independent voting board: 40%; rating input score 40; 9th percentile among comparable filings
- Governance controls: 5 of 9 controls in place; rating input score 62
- Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
- Whistleblower policy: Pass
- Document-retention policy: Pass
- CEO compensation review process: Limited
- Other executive compensation review process: Fail
- Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
- Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
- Audit committee oversight: Missing
- Independent financial-statement audit: Fail
Sustainability
- Operating margin: 0%; rating input score 26; 26th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 8.08; rating input score 87; 87th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0; rating input score 96; 96th percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 1.5%; rating input score 77; 77th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: 6.8% per year; rating input score 100; 46th percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: 6.8% per year; rating input score 100; 50th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 6.1% per year; rating input score 100; 39th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 100% of revenue deployed · 100% of spending went to programs
- Governance: 2 of 5 board members independent · 5 of 9 filing controls reported
- Programs: 1 filed program accomplishment · $4.9M in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $136K · 4 people listed
- Consistency: 13 of 13 current checks pass
- Schedules: 5 filed schedules · includes grants and related organizations
- Filing history: 12 filing years from 2013 to 2025
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: 1 filed money-flow record
- Related organizations: 3 filed related-organization links
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- Moderate — Accountability: Independent voting board scored 40/100.
- Review — Accountability: Governance controls: 2 of 7 not reported.
- High — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 26/100.