Stand Up America Inc

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
320512546
IRS 990 coverage
2018–2024
Forms available
Form 990 2024
Location
New York, NY, USA
Phone
3019519090
Rating
81
Verdict
STRONG
Rating confidence
Moderate
Sector
Civil Rights

Official website

Reported finances

Revenue
$2,063,752
Expenses
$6,966,142
Assets
$1,207,709
Liabilities
$144,242

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

7 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • SEAN ELDRIDGE (PRESIDENT)
  • CHRISTINA HARVEY (EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR)

Highest reported compensation

  • CHRISTINA HARVEY (EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR): $273,983 total reported compensation
  • JOSEPH HINES (MANAGING DIR., DIGITAL CAMPAIGNS): $243,228 total reported compensation
  • BRETT EDKINS (MANAGING DIR., POLITICAL AFFAIRS): $195,357 total reported compensation

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

Stand up america was established to educate, organize, and mobilize americans to protect and strengthen our democracy. We are working at the local, state, and federal levels to increase voter participation and build a more representative democracy by passing legislation that would expand voting rights, reduce the impact of big money in elections, reform our supreme court, fight corruption, and end undemocratic barriers that have been built to impede these policies.

What it reported doing in 2024

Stand up america advocates for government policies that will strengthen our democracy and increase access to voting and opposes policies that threaten our democracy and our freedom to vote. We educate and mobilize our members using email, sms, and social media communications, as well as mobilize activists outside our community through texting, digital ads, and social media. In 2024, stand up america's members took action in every state to combat voter suppression, expand access to the ballot box, fight corruption, reform the supreme court, and build a more representative democracy. Together, they made more than 26,000 constituent calls, sent over 367,000 emails to lawmakers, and submitted over 10,000 letters to the editor in support of state and federal measures to protect and expand voting rights, ensure fair and impartial courts, and strengthen our democracy. At the federal level, stand up america worked to reform and restore impartiality back to the supreme court by advocating for a binding code of ethics, term limits, and expanding the court, driving over 225,000 calls and emails to lawmakers in support of supreme court reform legislation. We pushed the senate to confirm fair and impartial judges to lower court seats as well, including by driving over 61,000 constituent calls and emails to senators. We also worked to ensure free and fair elections by advocating for the federal government to allocate election infrastructure funding for state and local elections, driving over 65,000 emails to congress in support of funding and advocating for the passage of the john r. Lewis voting rights act to protect voting rights, driving nearly 20,000 constituent emails to lawmakers in support of this legislation.at the state level, stand up america joined with local coalitions to advocate for state voting rights act legislation in Minnesota and Michigan, for Maine to join the national popular vote interstate compact, for the passage of public campaign finance legislation in Hawaii, and to fully fund the public campaign finance program in New York. We also mobilized our community to oppose voter suppression legislation in Alabama, Arizona, and New Hampshire. Our members made over 2,000 phone calls and sent nearly 13,000 emails across these state campaigns. In many of the above state level legislative efforts, stand up america also provided digital support to local organizations, from setting up call lines and email tools for use by local advocates outside our community to running digital ads and texting programs. In some instances we also provided earned media support.finally, stand up america worked to encourage americans to turn out and vote in a number of non-partisan campaigns, encouraging them to register to vote and vote, including by running digital ads and urging others to post voting reminders on social media.

Operating model

Revenue model
Donor-supported. 61% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
Distribution model
Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.

The verdict

STRONG - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Expenses are high relative to revenue and total assets are small relative to annual expenses; liquid coverage is unknown.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 82
  • Transparency & Controls: 83
  • Accountability: 95
  • Sustainability: 10
  • Growth: 80

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 100%; rating input score 100
  • Program expense ratio: 79.9%; rating input score 80
  • Fundraising efficiency: Limited

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Pay-setting controls: 3 of 6 controls in place; rating input score 50
    • Compensation committee: Missing
    • Independent consultant: Missing
    • Other Form 990s reviewed: Pass
    • Written employment contract: Missing
    • Compensation survey or study: Pass
    • Board or committee approval: Pass
  • Foreign activity oversight: Limited
  • Grant itemization coverage: 100%; rating input score 100; 72nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
  • Related-party transparency: Limited

Accountability

  • Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Governance controls: 8 of 9 controls in place; rating input score 89
    • Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
    • Whistleblower policy: Pass
    • Document-retention policy: Pass
    • CEO compensation review process: Pass
    • Other executive compensation review process: Pass
    • Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
    • Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
    • Audit committee oversight: Fail
    • Independent financial-statement audit: Pass

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: -237.5%; rating input score 0; 0th percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.17; rating input score 5; 5th percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.12; rating input score 55; 55th percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 17.3%; rating input score 15; 15th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: 13.6% per year; rating input score 100; 74th percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: 18.1% per year; rating input score 100; 86th percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: -0.2% per year; rating input score 0; 12th percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 100% of revenue deployed · 79.9% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: 1 of 1 board members independent · 8 of 9 filing controls reported
  • Programs: 1 filed program accomplishment · $5.6M in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $274K · 7 people listed · 3 of 6 pay-setting controls reported
  • Highest-paid contractors: 5 contractors listed · $2.5M reported
  • Consistency: 31 of 31 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 7 filed schedules · includes major donors, grants, and executive pay
  • Filing history: 6 filing years from 2018 to 2024
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Money network: 7 filed money-flow records
  • Related organizations: 2 filed related-organization links
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
  • Staff and benefit plans: Retirement and health plans the organization files with the Department of Labor, and the people in them.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • High — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 0/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 5/100.
  • High — Growth: Asset growth scored 0/100.
  • Review — Accountability: Governance controls: Audit committee oversight not reported.
  • High — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 15/100.
  • Review — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 55/100.