Stafford House
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 800235397
- IRS 990 coverage
- 2022–2024
- Forms available
- Form 990 2024, Form 990-N 2021
- Location
- Detroit, MI, USA
- Phone
- 3134435485
- Rating
- 90
- Verdict
- STRONG
- Rating confidence
- Standard
- Sector
- Half-Way House for Offenders, Ex-Offenders
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $82,828
- Expenses
- $96,331
- Assets
- $242,693
- Liabilities
- $6,088
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
4 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- LENDON CROSBY (PRESIDENT)
People named in this filing
- LENDON CROSBY (PRESIDENT)
- VENUS CROSBY (TREASURER)
- JUSTIN PAYNE (SECRETARY)
Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
Our nbsp; mission nbsp; is nbsp; to nbsp; enrich nbsp; the nbsp; lives nbsp; of nbsp; under nbsp; privileged nbsp; youth nbsp; through nbsp; safe-affordable nbsp; housing nbsp; education nbsp; and nbsp; job nbsp; training nbsp; we nbsp; sponsor nbsp; programs nbsp; that nbsp; empower nbsp; young nbsp; people nbsp; to nbsp; make nbsp; their nbsp; community nbsp; better nbsp; and nbsp; improve nbsp; the nbsp; quality nbsp; of nbsp; their nbsp; lives
What it reported doing in 2024
Our mission is to enrich the lives of under privileged youth through safe-affordable housing education and job training. We sponsor programs that empower young people to make their community better and improve the quality of their lives.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Donor-supported. 100% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
- Distribution model
- Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
The verdict
STRONG - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Some filing-based governance responses are negative or unanswered and expenses are high relative to revenue.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 95
- Transparency & Controls: 100
- Accountability: 76
- Sustainability: 41
- Growth: 100
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 100%; rating input score 100
- Program expense ratio: 88.3%; rating input score 88
- Fundraising efficiency: $82.83 raised per $1 spent on fundraising; rating input score 88; 88th percentile among comparable filings
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
- Pay-setting controls: Limited
- Foreign activity oversight: Limited
- Grant itemization coverage: Limited
- Major donor itemization: Limited
- Related-party transparency: Limited
Accountability
- Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 64th percentile among comparable filings
- Governance controls: 3 of 7 controls in place; rating input score 43
- Conflict-of-interest policy: Fail
- Whistleblower policy: Fail
- Document-retention policy: Fail
- CEO compensation review process: NotApplicable
- Other executive compensation review process: NotApplicable
- Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
- Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
- Audit committee oversight: Fail
- Independent financial-statement audit: Pass
Sustainability
- Operating margin: -16.3%; rating input score 42; 42nd percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 2.52; rating input score 37; 37th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.03; rating input score 24; 24th percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 60; 60th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: 43.1% per year; rating input score 100; 93rd percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: 12.7% per year; rating input score 100; 90th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 101.5% per year; rating input score 100; 99th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 100% of revenue deployed · 88.3% of spending went to programs
- Governance: 4 of 4 board members independent · 3 of 7 filing controls reported
- Programs: 1 filed program accomplishment · $96K in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 4 people listed
- Consistency: 16 of 16 current checks pass
- Schedules: 2 filed schedules
- Filing history: 3 filing years from 2022 to 2024
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- Moderate — Accountability: Governance controls: 4 of 7 not reported.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 42/100.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 37/100.
- High — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 24/100.