St. William's Living Center
Legal name: St William's Living Center
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 410871261
- IRS 990 coverage
- 2015–2024
- Official website data refreshed
- Sep 2026
- Forms available
- Form 990 2024
- Location
- Parkers Prairie, MN, US
- Phone
- 218-338-4671
- Rating
- 77
- Verdict
- SUPPORTED
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $11,074,364
- Expenses
- $10,434,464
- Assets
- $19,178,913
- Liabilities
- $8,341,356
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
7 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- SCOTT HOFFMAN (PRESIDENT)
- JEROME HAGGENMILLER (VICE PRESIDENT)
Highest reported compensation
- TIM KELLY (ADMINISTRATOR/TREASURER): $161,761 total reported compensation
- ROSE HINRICHS (SECRETARY): $2,400 total reported compensation
- JEROME HAGGENMILLER (VICE PRESIDENT): $2,100 total reported compensation
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
To provide compassionate, high-quality care and a home-like environment for seniors, with a focus on skilled nursing, therapy, and assisted living services.
What it reported doing in 2024
Willow creek senior community: st. Williams living center also operates a 28 unit independent and assisted living. This includes 3 meals served daily, building and grounds maintenance, weekly light housekeeping for linen and trash removal, group social and recreational activities, home care provider staff available 24 hours a day, and wireless emergency call systems. They also provide the following optional services: medication assistance, assistance with personal care need in bathing, ambulation, or dressing, personal laundry, housekeeping, appointment arrangements, skin and wound care, and rehabilitation therapies.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Earned-program. 96% of the money available for current operations came from fees and other program revenue.
- Distribution model
- Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
The verdict
SUPPORTED - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. A relatively small share of voting board members are independent and expenses are high relative to revenue.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 72
- Transparency & Controls: 92
- Accountability: 66
- Sustainability: 57
- Growth: 100
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 78.9%; rating input score 79
- Program expense ratio: 84.4%; rating input score 84
- Fundraising efficiency: Limited
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 62nd percentile among comparable filings
- Pay-setting controls: Limited
- Foreign activity oversight: Limited
- Grant itemization coverage: Limited
- Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
- Related-party transparency: Limited
Accountability
- Independent voting board: 50%; rating input score 50; 8th percentile among comparable filings
- Governance controls: 8 of 9 controls in place; rating input score 89
- Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
- Whistleblower policy: Fail
- Document-retention policy: Pass
- CEO compensation review process: Pass
- Other executive compensation review process: Pass
- Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
- Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
- Audit committee oversight: Pass
- Independent financial-statement audit: Pass
Sustainability
- Operating margin: 5.8%; rating input score 56; 56th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 1.84; rating input score 59; 59th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.43; rating input score 34; 34th percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 1.7%; rating input score 80; 80th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: 9% per year; rating input score 100; 66th percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: 7.6% per year; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 9.1% per year; rating input score 100; 61st percentile among comparable filings
Details
- What they do: 5 programs and campaigns described on the official site · 2 operating locations identified
- Where the money goes: 78.9% of revenue deployed · 84.4% of spending went to programs
- Governance: 3 of 6 board members independent · 8 of 9 filing controls reported
- Programs: 4 filed program accomplishments · $8.8M in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $162K · 7 people listed
- Highest-paid contractors: 1 contractor listed · $349K reported
- Consistency: 32 of 32 current checks pass
- Schedules: 7 filed schedules · includes major donors
- Filing history: 10 filing years from 2015 to 2024
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: 7 filed money-flow records
- Related organizations: 1 filed related-organization link
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
- Staff and benefit plans: Retirement and health plans the organization files with the Department of Labor, and the people in them.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- Review — Accountability: Independent voting board scored 50/100.
- Review — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 56/100.
- Review — Accountability: Governance controls: Whistleblower policy not reported.
- Review — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 59/100.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 34/100.