St Vincent Infirmary Medical Center
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 710236917
- IRS 990 coverage
- 2009–2024
- Forms available
- Form 990 2024, Form 990-T 2024
- Location
- Phoenix, AZ, USA
- Phone
- 5015523000
- Rating
- 79
- Verdict
- SUPPORTED
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Hospital, General
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $525,308,166
- Expenses
- $657,701,959
- Assets
- $1,077,134,384
- Liabilities
- $1,739,259,851
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
32 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- DOUG LAWSON MD (BOARD MEMBER/PRESIDENT-SOUTHERN DIVISION (THRU 02)
- LARRY SCHUMACHER (FORMER SENIOR VP-OPERATIONS-CEO/ BOARD MEMBER)
- CHAD ADUDDELL (MARKET PRESIDENT)
- DOUGLAS ROSS MD (PRESIDENT-ST VIN HS-MKT CMO)
- WILLIAM JONES (PRESIDENT-SVIMC)
- ANGELA LONGING (PRESIDENT-ST VINCENT MORRILTON/MKT CNO)
Highest reported compensation
- DOUG LAWSON MD (BOARD MEMBER/PRESIDENT-SOUTHERN DIVISION (THRU 02): $3,876,407 total reported compensation
- LARRY SCHUMACHER (FORMER SENIOR VP-OPERATIONS-CEO/ BOARD MEMBER): $2,514,435 total reported compensation
- S RAYBURN MD (CARDIOVASCULAR SURGEON): $2,297,295 total reported compensation
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
As an affiliate of commonspirit health, we make the healing presence of god known in our world by improving the health of the people we serve, especially those who are vulnerable, while we advance social justice for all.
What it reported doing in 2024
See schedule h
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Earned-program. 94% of the money available for current operations came from fees and other program revenue.
- Distribution model
- Direct operator. The filing allocates 97% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
The verdict
SUPPORTED - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Few specific pay-setting methods are documented in the filing; unanswered boxes are not proof of absence and expenses are high relative to revenue.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 87
- Transparency & Controls: 73
- Accountability: 79
- Sustainability: 24
- Growth: 100
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 100%; rating input score 100
- Program expense ratio: 93.6%; rating input score 94
- Fundraising efficiency: Limited
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 92.9%; rating input score 93; 17th percentile among comparable filings
- Pay-setting controls: 0 of 6 controls in place; rating input score 0
- Compensation committee: Missing
- Independent consultant: Missing
- Other Form 990s reviewed: Missing
- Written employment contract: Missing
- Compensation survey or study: Missing
- Board or committee approval: Missing
- Foreign activity oversight: Limited
- Grant itemization coverage: 97.8%; rating input score 98; 33rd percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
- Related-party transparency: Yes; rating input score 100
Accountability
- Independent voting board: 78.9%; rating input score 79; 27th percentile among comparable filings
- Governance controls: 7 of 9 controls in place; rating input score 78
- Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
- Whistleblower policy: Pass
- Document-retention policy: Pass
- CEO compensation review process: Fail
- Other executive compensation review process: Fail
- Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
- Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
- Audit committee oversight: Pass
- Independent financial-statement audit: Pass
Sustainability
- Operating margin: -25.2%; rating input score 3; 3rd percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 1.64; rating input score 56; 56th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 1.61; rating input score 2; 2nd percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 2.4%; rating input score 48; 48th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: 3.9% per year; rating input score 100; 30th percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: 2.9% per year; rating input score 100; 21st percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 8% per year; rating input score 100; 59th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 100% of revenue deployed · 93.6% of spending went to programs
- Governance: 15 of 19 board members independent · 7 of 9 filing controls reported
- Programs: 1 filed program accomplishment · $615.6M in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $3.9M · 32 people listed · 0 of 6 pay-setting controls reported
- Highest-paid contractors: 5 contractors listed · $97.1M reported
- Consistency: 35 of 36 current checks pass · 1 finding to review
- Schedules: 10 filed schedules · includes major donors, grants, executive pay, and related organizations
- Filing history: 16 filing years from 2009 to 2024
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: 22 filed money-flow records
- Related organizations: 340 filed related-organization links
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- High — Transparency & Controls: Pay-setting controls scored 0/100.
- High — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 3/100.
- Review — Accountability: Governance controls: 2 of 9 not reported.
- Review — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 56/100.
- High — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 2/100.
- Review — Transparency & Controls: Domestic grant itemization did not reconcile in the filed values.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 48/100.