Ascension St. Vincent Anderson Foundation

Legal name: St Vincent Anderson Regional Hospital Foundation Inc

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN: 352053693
IRS 990 coverage: 2009–2024
Official website data refreshed: Sep 2026
Forms available: Form 990 2024
Location: St Louis, MO, USA
Phone: 3147338000
Rating: 66
Verdict: SUPPORTED
Rating confidence: Standard

Official website

Reported finances

Revenue: $1,149,455
Expenses: $702,416
Assets: $7,484,767
Liabilities: $90,720

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

14 people listed

Highest reported compensation

JOSHUA BEN GREENE MD (DIRECTOR): $779,596 total reported compensation
MARION ANN TEIXEIRA (DIRECTOR): $497,767 total reported compensation
BECKY L JACOBSON (VP, FINANCE): $471,810 total reported compensation

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

Rooted in the loving ministry of Jesus as healer, we commit ourselves to serving all persons with special attention to those who are poor and vulnerable.

What it reported doing in 2024

THE FILING ORGANIZATION IS A PART OF THE ASCENSION CATHOLIC HEALTH MINISTRY. ASCENSION IS A FAITH-BASED HEALTHCARE ORGANIZATION THAT DELIVERS PERSONALIZED, COMPASSIONATE CARE TO ALL, ESPECIALLY TO THOSE WHO NEED IT THE MOST. The Ascension St. Vincent Anderson Foundation is a non profit organization that was established in 1998 to fund state-of-the-art technological research and equipment, renovations and expansions, and programs/services that strive to improve community health outcomes.

Operating model

Revenue model: Mixed. Its operating money came from several sources; no one source provided a clear majority.
Distribution model: Grant intermediary. The nonprofit sent 96% of its reported program spending out as grants.

Includes noncash contributions: Reported contributions include donated property or goods.

The verdict

SUPPORTED - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Few specific pay-setting methods are documented in the filing; unanswered boxes are not proof of absence and fundraising costs are high for each dollar raised.

Rating breakdown

Financial Efficiency: 61
Transparency & Controls: 73
Accountability: 74
Sustainability: 78
Growth: 20

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

Mission deployment rate: 66.7%; rating input score 67
Program expense ratio: 68.4%; rating input score 68
Fundraising efficiency: $4.22 raised per $1 spent on fundraising; rating input score 14; 14th percentile among comparable filings

Transparency & Controls

Consistency checks: 92.9%; rating input score 93; 19th percentile among comparable filings
Pay-setting controls: 0 of 6 controls in place; rating input score 0
- Compensation committee: Missing
- Independent consultant: Missing
- Other Form 990s reviewed: Missing
- Written employment contract: Missing
- Compensation survey or study: Missing
- Board or committee approval: Missing
Foreign activity oversight: Limited
Grant itemization coverage: 98.9%; rating input score 99; 48th percentile among comparable filings
Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
Related-party transparency: Yes; rating input score 100

Accountability

Independent voting board: 72.7%; rating input score 73; 15th percentile among comparable filings
Governance controls: 6 of 9 controls in place; rating input score 75
- Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
- Whistleblower policy: Pass
- Document-retention policy: Pass
- CEO compensation review process: Limited
- Other executive compensation review process: Fail
- Form 990 shared with the board: Fail
- Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
- Audit committee oversight: Pass
- Independent financial-statement audit: Pass

Sustainability

Operating margin: 38.9%; rating input score 89; 89th percentile among comparable filings
Total-asset coverage ratio: 10.66; rating input score 92; 92nd percentile among comparable filings
Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.01; rating input score 67; 67th percentile among comparable filings
Officer compensation ratio: 24.4%; rating input score 10; 10th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

Program expense growth: -6% per year; rating input score 0; 7th percentile among comparable filings
Revenue growth: -3.7% per year; rating input score 0; 6th percentile among comparable filings
Asset growth: 2.8% per year; rating input score 100; 29th percentile among comparable filings

Details

What they do: 2 programs and campaigns described on the official site · 1 operating location identified
Where the money goes: 66.7% of revenue deployed · 68.4% of spending went to programs
Governance: 8 of 11 board members independent · 6 of 9 filing controls reported
Programs: 1 filed program accomplishment · $481K in reported program spending
Leadership: top reported pay $780K · 14 people listed · 0 of 6 pay-setting controls reported
Consistency: 22 of 23 current checks pass · 1 finding to review
Schedules: 8 filed schedules · includes major donors, grants, executive pay, and related organizations
Filing history: 15 filing years from 2009 to 2024
Contacts: How to reach this organization
Money network: 2 filed money-flow records
Related organizations: 379 filed related-organization links
Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

High — Transparency & Controls: Pay-setting controls scored 0/100.
High — Financial Efficiency: Fundraising efficiency scored 14/100.
Review — Accountability: Governance controls: 2 of 8 not reported.
High — Growth: Program expense growth scored 0/100.
High — Growth: Revenue growth scored 0/100.
Review — Transparency & Controls: Domestic grant itemization did not reconcile in the filed values.
High — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 10/100.