St Thomas Rescue Inc

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
660378137
IRS 990 coverage
2021–2025
Forms available
Form 990 2025
Location
St Thomas, VI, USA
Phone
3405147366
Rating
73
Verdict
SUPPORTED
Rating confidence
Moderate
Sector
Search and Rescue Squads

Reported finances

Revenue
$195,346
Expenses
$114,458
Assets
$280,948
Liabilities
$372

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

5 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • LISTON THOMAS (PRESIDENT)
  • JOSE TROTMAN (VICE PRESIDENT)

People named in this filing

  • LISTON THOMAS (PRESIDENT)
  • JOSE TROTMAN (VICE PRESIDENT)
  • STACEY SCOTLAND (SECRETARY)

Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

This organization conducts search and rescue operations involving accidents, both land and sea. The organization is also involved in education of the public about this program and the services it offers.

What it reported doing in 2025

This organization conducts search and rescue operations involving accidents, both land and sea. The organization is also involved in education of the public about this program and the services it offers. TECHNICAL RESCUES-187-Incidents requiring specialist equipment or personnel-Height, confined space, below grade or similar. MEDICAL CALLS ATTENDED-248-Moderate to serious medical trauma calls-Cardiac arrest or similar critical-drowning or similar critical. ROAD TRAFFIC COLLISIONS-97-Collisions involving serious injuries-Persons trapped- Vehicles in a precarious position. COMMUNITY OUTREACH-147- The number of public events weve supported in a medical, or safety role across the territory. MARINE RESCUES- 41-Missing persons at sea- Recovery operations- Boating accidents. WATER RELATED FATALITIES-41 The number of water-related incidents attended, resulting in a loss of life. AVERAGE RESPONSE TIME-126 SECONDS-Were exceeding the national time by nearly 3minutes.

Operating model

Revenue model
Grant-funded. 91% of the money available for current operations came from government grants.
Distribution model
Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.

The verdict

SUPPORTED - The filed numbers largely add up and a large share of total spending goes to programs. A relatively small share of available resources goes toward mission work and some filing-based governance responses are negative or unanswered.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 64
  • Transparency & Controls: 92
  • Accountability: 76
  • Sustainability: 74
  • Growth: 20

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 57.1%; rating input score 57
  • Program expense ratio: 97.4%; rating input score 97
  • Fundraising efficiency: Limited

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 90%; rating input score 90; 10th percentile among comparable filings
  • Pay-setting controls: Limited
  • Foreign activity oversight: Limited
  • Grant itemization coverage: Limited
  • Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
  • Related-party transparency: Limited

Accountability

  • Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 64th percentile among comparable filings
  • Governance controls: 3 of 7 controls in place; rating input score 43
    • Conflict-of-interest policy: Fail
    • Whistleblower policy: Fail
    • Document-retention policy: Pass
    • CEO compensation review process: NotApplicable
    • Other executive compensation review process: NotApplicable
    • Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
    • Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
    • Audit committee oversight: Missing
    • Independent financial-statement audit: Fail

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: 41.4%; rating input score 87; 87th percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 2.45; rating input score 64; 64th percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 0; rating input score 50; 50th percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 67; 67th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: -24.1% per year; rating input score 0; 5th percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: -16.7% per year; rating input score 0; 3rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: 26.2% per year; rating input score 100; 88th percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 57.1% of revenue deployed · 97.4% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: 5 of 5 board members independent · 3 of 7 filing controls reported
  • Programs: 1 filed program accomplishment · $112K in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 5 people listed
  • Consistency: 17 of 18 current checks pass · 1 finding to review
  • Schedules: 3 filed schedules · includes major donors
  • Filing history: 5 filing years from 2021 to 2025
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Money network: Resolved incoming and outgoing counterparties from filed money flows.
  • Related organizations: Filed and resolved organization relationships.
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • Review — Financial Efficiency: Mission deployment rate scored 57/100.
  • Moderate — Accountability: Governance controls: 3 of 6 not reported.
  • High — Growth: Program expense growth scored 0/100.
  • High — Growth: Revenue growth scored 0/100.
  • Moderate — Transparency & Controls: Schedule A contributions reconciliation did not reconcile in the filed values.
  • Review — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 50/100.