St. Rose Dominican Health Foundation
Legal name: St Rose Dominican Health Foundation
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 880349432
- IRS 990 coverage
- 2009–2024
- Official website data refreshed
- Sep 2026
- Forms available
- Form 990 2024
- Location
- Phoenix, AZ, USA
- Phone
- 7026165765
- Rating
- 73
- Verdict
- SUPPORTED
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Health - General and Rehabilitative N.E.C.
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $11,591,641
- Expenses
- $12,600,124
- Assets
- $31,095,591
- Liabilities
- $2,364,241
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
23 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- JULIE SPRENGEL (FORMER OFFICER (PRESIDENT))
- CHAD WARREN DPP (EX-OFF DIRECTOR/FND PRESIDENT & CPO)
Highest reported compensation
- JULIE SPRENGEL (FORMER OFFICER (PRESIDENT)): $7,074,593 total reported compensation
- CHARLES L GUIDA (FORMER OFFICER (FOUNDATION PRES)): $572,109 total reported compensation
- THOMAS BURNS RN BSN MBA (DIRECTOR): $519,695 total reported compensation
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
To honor our founders’ vision and deliver compassionate, innovative care that will impact lives for generations.
What it reported doing in 2024
The foundation is an irc sec 509(a)(3) supporting organization to dignity health, dba st. Rose dominican hospital ("hospital"). As a supporting organization, the foundation operates exclusively for the benefit of, to perform the functions of, or to carry out the purposes of the hospital which includes making payments directly to the hospital.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Donor-supported. 62% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
- Distribution model
- Grant intermediary. The nonprofit sent 100% of its reported program spending out as grants.
- Includes noncash contributions: Reported contributions include donated property or goods.
The verdict
SUPPORTED - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Few specific pay-setting methods are documented in the filing; unanswered boxes are not proof of absence and fundraising costs are high for each dollar raised.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 76
- Transparency & Controls: 71
- Accountability: 72
- Sustainability: 39
- Growth: 100
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 86.4%; rating input score 86
- Program expense ratio: 71.6%; rating input score 72
- Fundraising efficiency: $9.16 raised per $1 spent on fundraising; rating input score 36; 36th percentile among comparable filings
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 62nd percentile among comparable filings
- Pay-setting controls: 0 of 6 controls in place; rating input score 0
- Compensation committee: Missing
- Independent consultant: Missing
- Other Form 990s reviewed: Missing
- Written employment contract: Missing
- Compensation survey or study: Missing
- Board or committee approval: Missing
- Foreign activity oversight: Limited
- Grant itemization coverage: 99.9%; rating input score 100; 39th percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
- Related-party transparency: Limited
Accountability
- Independent voting board: 76.2%; rating input score 76; 14th percentile among comparable filings
- Governance controls: 6 of 9 controls in place; rating input score 67
- Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
- Whistleblower policy: Pass
- Document-retention policy: Pass
- CEO compensation review process: Fail
- Other executive compensation review process: Fail
- Form 990 shared with the board: Fail
- Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
- Audit committee oversight: Pass
- Independent financial-statement audit: Pass
Sustainability
- Operating margin: -8.7%; rating input score 12; 12th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 2.47; rating input score 69; 69th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.08; rating input score 78; 78th percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 6.7%; rating input score 37; 37th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: 10.2% per year; rating input score 100; 71st percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: 6.5% per year; rating input score 100; 56th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 6.4% per year; rating input score 100; 45th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- What they do: 3 programs and campaigns described on the official site · 2 operating locations identified
- Where the money goes: 86.4% of revenue deployed · 71.6% of spending went to programs
- Governance: 16 of 21 board members independent · 6 of 9 filing controls reported
- Programs: 1 filed program accomplishment · $9M in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $7.1M · 23 people listed · 0 of 6 pay-setting controls reported
- Highest-paid contractors: 1 contractor listed · $106K reported
- Consistency: 30 of 30 current checks pass
- Schedules: 10 filed schedules · includes major donors, grants, and executive pay
- Filing history: 16 filing years from 2009 to 2024
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: 4 filed money-flow records
- Related organizations: 337 filed related-organization links
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- High — Transparency & Controls: Pay-setting controls scored 0/100.
- Moderate — Financial Efficiency: Fundraising efficiency scored 36/100.
- Review — Accountability: Governance controls: 3 of 9 not reported.
- High — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 12/100.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 37/100.