St Rita's Medical Center
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 341105619
- IRS 990 coverage
- 2010–2013
- Forms available
- Form 990 2013
- Location
- Lima, OH, USA
- Phone
- 4192273361
- Rating
- 66
- Verdict
- SUPPORTED
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Hospital, General
- Affiliation
- Christianity
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $448,412,201
- Expenses
- $391,470,345
- Assets
- $0
- Liabilities
- $0
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2013. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
34 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- ROBERT BAXTER (MARKET PRESIDENT & CEO, SRHP)
- CHRISTINE PROVAZNIK (VICE PRESIDENT)
- DAVID MURPHY (EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR, SRPS)
Highest reported compensation
- JAMES MAY (Board Member, CHP EVP & COO): $1,839,906 total reported compensation
- DR ZOHEIR ABDELBAKI (CARDIOLOGIST): $1,661,552 total reported compensation
- DR JULIUS KATO (CARDIOLOGIST): $1,095,742 total reported compensation
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2013. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
St. Rita's medical center extends the healing ministry of jesus by improving the health of our communities with emphasis on people who are poor and under-served. St. Rita's medical center demonstrates behaviors reflecting our core values of compassion, excellence, human dignity, justice, sacredness of life, and service. Together we commit to: compassion - our commitment to serve with mercy and tenderness; excellence - our commitment to be the best in the quality of our services and the stewardship of our resources; human dignity - our commitment to be respectful of all persons; justice - our commitment to act with integrity, honesty, and truthfulness; sacredness of life - our commitment to reverence all life; service - our commitment to respond to those in need.
What it reported doing in 2013
The primary exempt purpose of st. Rita's medical center is to extend the healing ministry of jesus by improving the health of our communities with emphasis on people who are poor and under-served. St. Rita's medical center accomplishes this purpose by demonstrating behaviors reflecting our core values of compassion, excellence, human dignity, justice, sacredness of life and service. Total net community benefit provided in 2013 was $42,745,099 serving approximately 192,000 individuals.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Other-operating. 99% of the money available for current operations came from other operating revenue.
- Distribution model
- Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
The verdict
SUPPORTED - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and most voting board members are independent. Few specific pay-setting methods are documented in the filing; unanswered boxes are not proof of absence and assets have declined or grown slowly.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 73
- Transparency & Controls: 58
- Accountability: 76
- Sustainability: 43
- Growth: 40
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 78.8%; rating input score 79
- Program expense ratio: 88.1%; rating input score 88
- Fundraising efficiency: Limited
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 91.7%; rating input score 92; 6th percentile among comparable filings
- Pay-setting controls: 0 of 6 controls in place; rating input score 0
- Compensation committee: Missing
- Independent consultant: Missing
- Other Form 990s reviewed: Missing
- Written employment contract: Missing
- Compensation survey or study: Missing
- Board or committee approval: Missing
- Foreign activity oversight: Limited
- Grant itemization coverage: 66.6%; rating input score 67; 15th percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Limited
- Related-party transparency: Scored; rating input score 0
Accountability
- Independent voting board: 66.7%; rating input score 67; 21st percentile among comparable filings
- Governance controls: 8 of 9 controls in place; rating input score 89
- Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
- Whistleblower policy: Pass
- Document-retention policy: Pass
- CEO compensation review process: Fail
- Other executive compensation review process: Pass
- Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
- Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
- Audit committee oversight: Pass
- Independent financial-statement audit: Pass
Sustainability
- Operating margin: 12.7%; rating input score 81; 81st percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 0; rating input score 0; 0th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: Limited
- Officer compensation ratio: 2.4%; rating input score 42; 42nd percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: Limited
- Revenue growth: 5% per year; rating input score 100; 54th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: -39.3% per year; rating input score 0; 1st percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 78.8% of revenue deployed · 88.1% of spending went to programs
- Governance: 10 of 15 board members independent · 8 of 9 filing controls reported
- Programs: 1 filed program accomplishment · $344.7M in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $1.8M · 34 people listed · 0 of 6 pay-setting controls reported
- Consistency: 29 of 30 current checks pass · 1 finding to review
- Schedules: 10 filed schedules · includes grants, executive pay, and related organizations
- Filing history: 4 filing years from 2010 to 2013
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: 36 filed money-flow records
- Related organizations: 119 filed related-organization links
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- High — Transparency & Controls: Pay-setting controls scored 0/100.
- High — Growth: Asset growth scored 0/100.
- High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 0/100.
- High — Transparency & Controls: Related-party transparency scored 0/100.
- Review — Accountability: Governance controls: CEO compensation review process not reported.
- Review — Transparency & Controls: Domestic grant itemization did not reconcile in the filed values.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 42/100.