St Raymond Community Outreach Inc
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 134043234
- IRS 990 coverage
- 2009–2012
- Forms available
- Form 990 2012
- Location
- Bronx, NY, USA
- Phone
- 7188240353
- Rating confidence
- Limited
- Sector
- Neighborhood Centers
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $523,046
- Expenses
- $754,210
- Assets
- $814,111
- Liabilities
- $33,497
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2012. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
14 people listed
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2012. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
The mission of st. Raymond community outreach (srco) is to empower the high-risk low-income children, youth and families of the parkchester/east bronx communities to achieve social equity, economic self-sufficiency and academic success. An increased emphasis on cradle to career services bolsters participants' developmental and academic trajectories, equipping them with the skills and opportunities they need to succeed.the mission of srco is to be the primary cultural arts, social service and academic support foundation for the parkchester/east bronx communities. From our early childhood development program, play & learn, through k-12 achieve, aidp and high school age academic support program, and our healthy families case management assistance initiatives, our constituents will seek out srco first and find the critical answers and support to meet and achieve their goals.
What it reported doing in 2012
The attendance improvement/dropout prevention program at renaissance high school, within the lehman high school complex, works closely with a cohort of 50+ students. These students have a history of poor attendance and academic performance. Two master's level staff members (guidance counseling) use various means to insure that the students attend school and improve their academic performance. This is accomplished through home visits, phone calls, individual and small group counseling, and special events as incentives. This intergenerational initiative matches senior citizen and high school teen, one-on-one, and they share life experiences. Those experiences are then recorded and written as an anthology after 8-90 minute sessions. Throughout the year, other intergenerational events take place with seniors and srco's client population. The seniors come from parkchester's senior center.parent and young children, ages 6 months to 3 years, meet and play together in structured activities 5 days per week. Singing, dancing, organized games and children's social activities are held with each session. Additionally, there is a period where parents read to their child each session.the healthy families program provides individual and family support services through referral-based case management. One case manager (catholic charities) provides assistance to a minimum of 100 clients and their families. The actual number served last fiscal year was 156. Clients came from the community boards 9 and 10. They received assessment, referrals and follow-up until their goals were met.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Grant-funded. 69% of the money available for current operations came from government grants.
- Distribution model
- Cannot be determined from the filing. The filing does not provide enough consistent spending detail to tell whether the nonprofit works directly or through others.
The verdict
- The available evidence is not sufficient to produce an overall rating for this filing. This is not a warning sign.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: NotEnoughData
- Transparency & Controls: 92
- Accountability: 84
- Sustainability: 27
- Growth: 40
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: Limited
- Program expense ratio: Limited
- Fundraising efficiency: Limited
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 60th percentile among comparable filings
- Pay-setting controls: Limited
- Foreign activity oversight: Limited
- Grant itemization coverage: Limited
- Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
- Related-party transparency: Limited
Accountability
- Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 64th percentile among comparable filings
- Governance controls: 5 of 8 controls in place; rating input score 62
- Conflict-of-interest policy: Fail
- Whistleblower policy: Fail
- Document-retention policy: Fail
- CEO compensation review process: Pass
- Other executive compensation review process: NotApplicable
- Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
- Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
- Audit committee oversight: Pass
- Independent financial-statement audit: Pass
Sustainability
- Operating margin: -44.2%; rating input score 3; 3rd percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 1.08; rating input score 48; 48th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.04; rating input score 67; 67th percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 11.7%; rating input score 29; 29th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: Limited
- Revenue growth: 7.5% per year; rating input score 100; 65th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: -29.7% per year; rating input score 0; 5th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: Financial trends and filed revenue, expense, asset, and liability detail
- Governance: 10 of 10 board members independent · 5 of 8 filing controls reported
- Programs: 2 filed program accomplishments · $560K in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $89K · 14 people listed
- Consistency: 28 of 28 current checks pass
- Schedules: 5 filed schedules · includes major donors
- Filing history: 4 filing years from 2009 to 2012
- Related organizations: 1 filed related-organization link
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
Grant-readiness screening is separate from the live rating, not a measure of program quality. Review the source records before making a grant decision.
- Review — Accountability: Governance controls: 3 of 8 not reported.
- High — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 3/100.
- High — Growth: Asset growth scored 0/100.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 48/100.
- High — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 29/100.
- High — Grant Readiness: Automatic revocation: this organization had its federal tax-exempt status automatically revoked.