St Paul's Plus Inc

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
521748592
IRS 990 coverage
2009–2018
Forms available
Form 990 2018
Location
Brooklandville, MD, USA
Phone
4108230061
Rating
79
Verdict
SUPPORTED
Rating confidence
Moderate
Sector
Child Day Care

Official website

Reported finances

Revenue
$2,498,469
Expenses
$2,238,613
Assets
$0
Liabilities
$0

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2018. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

52 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • JOANNE P BARTLETT (CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER)
  • ELIZABETH S ROBINSON (PRESIDENT)
  • ELISE A BUTLER (VICE PRESIDENT)
  • STEVEN B STENERSEN (VICE PRESIDENT)
  • ISABEL C NUSSBAUMER (EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR)

Highest reported compensation

  • PENNY BACH EVINS (HEAD OF SCHOOL, SPSG): $509,186 total reported compensation
  • DAVID C FAUS (HEAD OF SCHOOL, SPS): $480,354 total reported compensation
  • KATHRYN GOULD MCKEW (CFO/COO): $206,737 total reported compensation

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2018. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

The goal of st. Paul's plus is to provide a program to promote the growth - emotionally, socially, physically, and intellectually of each child at his or her own pace. Every effort is made to identify and fulfill the individual needs of each child so that he or she may realize his or her full potential. At the heart of the program is the knowledge that children need to feel safe and loved in order to reach out to the world around them. By demonstrating a positive, loving environment, our teachers help children build a bond of trust and care that forms a foundation for life-long learning.

What it reported doing in 2018

Our program strives to offer a balanced approach to academics and play. We recognize that children learn by doing and interacting with their environment and use a multi-sensory approach to introducing new concepts to children. The program served 135 children during the year.

Operating model

Revenue model
Earned-program. 99% of the money available for current operations came from fees and other program revenue.
Distribution model
Direct operator. The filing allocates 98% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.

The verdict

SUPPORTED - The filed numbers largely add up and a large share of available resources goes toward mission work. Total assets are small relative to annual expenses; liquid coverage is unknown and assets have declined or grown slowly.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 68
  • Transparency & Controls: 91
  • Accountability: 93
  • Sustainability: 34
  • Growth: 80

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 73.5%; rating input score 73
  • Program expense ratio: 82%; rating input score 82
  • Fundraising efficiency: Limited

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 62nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Pay-setting controls: 5 of 6 controls in place; rating input score 83
    • Compensation committee: Pass
    • Independent consultant: Pass
    • Other Form 990s reviewed: Pass
    • Written employment contract: Missing
    • Compensation survey or study: Pass
    • Board or committee approval: Pass
  • Foreign activity oversight: Limited
  • Grant itemization coverage: 100%; rating input score 100; 71st percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
  • Related-party transparency: Limited

Accountability

  • Independent voting board: 96%; rating input score 96; 27th percentile among comparable filings
  • Governance controls: 8 of 9 controls in place; rating input score 89
    • Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
    • Whistleblower policy: Pass
    • Document-retention policy: Pass
    • CEO compensation review process: Pass
    • Other executive compensation review process: Fail
    • Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
    • Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
    • Audit committee oversight: Pass
    • Independent financial-statement audit: Pass

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: 10.4%; rating input score 69; 69th percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 0; rating input score 0; 0th percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: Limited
  • Officer compensation ratio: 17.8%; rating input score 11; 11th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: 1.5% per year; rating input score 100; 30th percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: 3.3% per year; rating input score 100; 41st percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: -2.4% per year; rating input score 0; 15th percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 73.5% of revenue deployed · 82% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: 48 of 50 board members independent · 8 of 9 filing controls reported
  • Programs: 1 filed program accomplishment · $1.8M in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $509K · 52 people listed · 5 of 6 pay-setting controls reported
  • Highest-paid contractors: 1 contractor listed · $180K reported
  • Consistency: 32 of 32 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 9 filed schedules · includes major donors, grants, and executive pay
  • Filing history: 10 filing years from 2009 to 2018
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Money network: 1 filed money-flow record
  • Related organizations: 4 filed related-organization links
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 0/100.
  • High — Growth: Asset growth scored 0/100.
  • Review — Accountability: Governance controls: Other executive compensation review process not reported.
  • High — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 11/100.