St. Paul's Senior Living Community

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
250773080
IRS 990 coverage
2010–2024
Official website data refreshed
Sep 2026
Forms available
Form 990 2024, Form 990-T 2024
Location
Greenville, PA, US
Phone
724-588-7610
Rating
81
Verdict
STRONG
Rating confidence
Moderate
Sector
Supportive Housing for Older Adults
Affiliation
Christianity

Official website

Reported finances

Revenue
$30,027,022
Expenses
$28,521,728
Assets
$89,308,745
Liabilities
$31,459,875

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

28 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • NANCY HOFFACKER (COLONY PRESIDENT)
  • MARC DUELL (COLONY VICE PRESIDENT)
  • CHRIS WRIGHT (PRESIDENT & CEO)

Highest reported compensation

  • CHRIS WRIGHT (PRESIDENT & CEO): $286,296 total reported compensation

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

Where compassionate care, faith-based values, and a non-profit mission create an exceptional senior living community.

What it reported doing in 2024

St. Paul homes operates a continuing care retirement community (ccrc) which provides housing care and services to elderly individuals in order to shelter and alleviate the distress and hardship of aging. At its campus, sph provides a continuum of services through its 90 independent living houses and 17 apartments (collectively known as the colony), two personal care facilities with a total of 144 apartments (the ridgewood and the heritage), and a 192 bed skilled nursing facility (the villas). A standard colony house features a full service kitchen, formal dining room, living room, sunroom, bathroom, powder room and a one car garage, however residents have several renovation options. Colony woodland houses offer seven different floor plans and include the option of factory built homes or traditional on site construction. Woodland homes generally feature three bedrooms, two baths, a large sunroom, patio, two-car garage, and central air conditioning. Residents of the colony have access to services including transportation, housekeeping, meals, emergency nurse visits, fitness center, social activities, and spiritual programs. The ridgewood at st paul's offers a unique personal care residence combining private apartments and personal care. The ridgewood, a 40 apartment personal care facility, is licensed by the department of public welfare and provides meals, personal laundry services, and assistance with housekeeping, giving residents time to enjoy their hobbies and participate in planned events. Transportation on and off campus is also available. A full-time licensed practical nurse coordinates residents' health care including medication management if needed, scheduling appointments and following up on recommended medical care. Personal care attendants, certified in cpr and first aid, provide assistance with all activities of daily living. The heritage, a 104 apartment personal care facility licensed by the department of public welfare, serves independent people as well as individuals that need assistance with daily activities. Aging-in-place services gives independent residents the opportunity to stay in their apartment and add personal care services (ie assistance with the activities of daily living) when needed. A full time lpn assists in coordinating health services. Included in the heritage is a secured alzheimers and dementia personal care neighborhood with 43 apartments. Sph's nursing facility known as the villas at st. Paul's opened in april 2005. The 192-bed villas provides nursing care and rehabilitation and expanded alzheimer's and dementia care services as well as expanded fitness program. The nursing facility is licensed by the pa dept of health and participates in both the medicare and medicaid programs.

Operating model

Revenue model
Earned-program. 82% of the money available for current operations came from fees and other program revenue.
Distribution model
Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.

The verdict

STRONG - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Fundraising costs are high for each dollar raised and expenses are high relative to revenue.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 76
  • Transparency & Controls: 74
  • Accountability: 100
  • Sustainability: 63
  • Growth: 100

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 85.3%; rating input score 85
  • Program expense ratio: 85.2%; rating input score 85
  • Fundraising efficiency: $2.14 raised per $1 spent on fundraising; rating input score 7; 7th percentile among comparable filings

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 62nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Pay-setting controls: 2 of 6 controls in place; rating input score 33
    • Compensation committee: Missing
    • Independent consultant: Missing
    • Other Form 990s reviewed: Missing
    • Written employment contract: Missing
    • Compensation survey or study: Pass
    • Board or committee approval: Pass
  • Foreign activity oversight: Limited
  • Grant itemization coverage: Limited
  • Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
  • Related-party transparency: Limited

Accountability

  • Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 66th percentile among comparable filings
  • Governance controls: 8 of 8 controls in place; rating input score 100
    • Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
    • Whistleblower policy: Pass
    • Document-retention policy: Pass
    • CEO compensation review process: Pass
    • Other executive compensation review process: NotApplicable
    • Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
    • Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
    • Audit committee oversight: Pass
    • Independent financial-statement audit: Pass

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: 5%; rating input score 54; 54th percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 3.13; rating input score 76; 76th percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.35; rating input score 41; 41st percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 1%; rating input score 85; 85th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: 1% per year; rating input score 100; 14th percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: 1.8% per year; rating input score 100; 16th percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: 3.5% per year; rating input score 100; 26th percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • What they do: 6 programs and campaigns described on the official site · 1 operating location identified
  • Where the money goes: 85.3% of revenue deployed · 85.2% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: 24 of 24 board members independent · 8 of 8 filing controls reported
  • Programs: 1 filed program accomplishment · $24.3M in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $286K · 28 people listed · 2 of 6 pay-setting controls reported
  • Highest-paid contractors: 5 contractors listed · $1.7M reported
  • Consistency: 30 of 30 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 5 filed schedules · includes major donors and executive pay
  • Filing history: 13 filing years from 2010 to 2024
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Money network: 1 filed money-flow record
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • High — Financial Efficiency: Fundraising efficiency scored 7/100.
  • Review — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 54/100.
  • Moderate — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 41/100.