St Paul District Dental Society Inc

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
410741367
IRS 990-EZ coverage
2015–2024
Forms available
Form 990 2014, Form 990-EZ 2024
Location
Minneapolis, MN, USA
Phone
6127678400
Rating
51
Verdict
MIXED
Rating confidence
Moderate

Reported finances

Revenue
$134,667
Expenses
$125,053
Assets
$359,690
Liabilities
$0

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

12 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • ERIK DAVIS DDS (IMMEDIATE PAST PRESIDENT)
  • DAVID RESCH DDS (PRESIDENT)
  • ANDREW LUND DDS - COUNCIL MEMBER (PRESIDENT-ELECT)

People named in this filing

  • GEETHA DAMODARAN DDS (TRUSTEE)
  • JOHN AAMODT DDS (COUNCIL MEMBER)
  • ALEJANDRO AGUIRRE DDS (COUNCIL MEMBER)

Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

To promote education and health literacy for the public by providing educational opportunities for dental hygiene students, dental assistant students and pre-dental students.

What it reported doing in 2024

The spdds is the local association of dentists which promotes the oral health of the public, ethics, science, and professional advancement of our members. The district held several virtual events to check-in with members, as well as ce programs. The district also distributed $21,000 in grant distributions to scholarship recipients (d3 and d4 students at the university of Minnesota school of dentistry). Income primarily comes from dues obtained through the Minnesota dental association.

Operating model

Revenue model
Mixed. Its operating money came from several sources; no one source provided a clear majority.
Distribution model
Transfer-based 990-EZ. The 990-EZ reports grants or member benefits, but it does not separate enough spending to show the nonprofit’s full delivery mix.

The verdict

MIXED - The filed numbers largely add up and total assets are large relative to annual expenses, but may not be spendable cash. A relatively small share of available resources goes toward mission work and revenue has declined or grown slowly.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 14
  • Transparency & Controls: 100
  • Sustainability: 67
  • Growth: 20

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 22%; rating input score 22
  • Program expense ratio: Limited

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 52nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: 7.1%; rating input score 52; 52nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 2.88; rating input score 89; 89th percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 0; rating input score 76; 76th percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 63; 63rd percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: Limited
  • Revenue growth: -2.9% per year; rating input score 0; 12th percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: 16.3% per year; rating input score 100; 75th percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 22% of revenue deployed
  • Governance: Filed governance answers
  • Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment
  • Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 12 people listed
  • Consistency: 7 of 7 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 3 filed schedules
  • Filing history: 10 filing years from 2015 to 2024
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Money network: Resolved incoming and outgoing counterparties from filed money flows.
  • Related organizations: Filed and resolved organization relationships.
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • High — Financial Efficiency: Mission deployment rate scored 22/100.
  • High — Growth: Revenue growth scored 0/100.
  • Review — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 52/100.