St Paul Boulevard Exempt Firemen's Association Inc

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
160620935
IRS 990 coverage
2010–2025
Forms available
Form 990 2025
Location
Rochester, NY, USA
Phone
5853424321
Rating
74
Verdict
SUPPORTED
Rating confidence
Moderate

Official website

Reported finances

Revenue
$175,271
Expenses
$138,417
Assets
$1,447,136
Liabilities
$1,957

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

7 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • Brian Hahn (President)
  • James Rehbach (Vice President)

Highest reported compensation

  • Joseph DeMart (Treasurer): $3,999 total reported compensation
  • Laura Fergosi (Secretary): $2,790 total reported compensation
  • James Rehbach (Vice President): $1,054 total reported compensation

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

See Schedule OTo promote a spirit of friendship and benevolence among its members and to assist in the welfare of one another. To aid and assist, at all times, in the welfare of the volunteer firemen of the department with which this association is affiliated, particularly those firemen suffering loss or injury, or deprivation to their families as a result of active engagement in fighting or preventing fires. To do any and all things necessary, appropriate, and lawful for the accomplishment of these purposes.

What it reported doing in 2025

To promote a spirit of friendship and benevolence among its members and to assist in the welfare of one another. To aid and assist, at all times, in the welfare of the volunteer firemen of the department with which this association is affiliated, particularly those firemen suffering loss or injury, or deprivation to their families as a result of active engagement in fighting or preventing fires. To do any and all things necessary, appropriate, and lawful for the accomplishment of these purposes.

Operating model

Revenue model
Mixed. Its operating money came from several sources; no one source provided a clear majority.
Distribution model
Member-benefit provider. The nonprofit used 64% of its reported program spending for member benefits.

The verdict

SUPPORTED - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Some filing-based governance responses are negative or unanswered and a relatively small share of voting board members are independent.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 73
  • Transparency & Controls: 90
  • Accountability: 47
  • Sustainability: 70
  • Growth: 100

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 84.3%; rating input score 84
  • Program expense ratio: 79.1%; rating input score 79
  • Fundraising efficiency: Limited

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 64th percentile among comparable filings
  • Pay-setting controls: Limited
  • Foreign activity oversight: Limited
  • Grant itemization coverage: Limited
  • Major donor itemization: Limited
  • Related-party transparency: Limited

Accountability

  • Independent voting board: 57.1%; rating input score 57; 19th percentile among comparable filings
  • Governance controls: 3 of 9 controls in place; rating input score 33
    • Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
    • Whistleblower policy: Fail
    • Document-retention policy: Fail
    • CEO compensation review process: Fail
    • Other executive compensation review process: Fail
    • Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
    • Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
    • Audit committee oversight: Fail
    • Independent financial-statement audit: Fail

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: 21%; rating input score 72; 72nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 10.45; rating input score 90; 90th percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 0; rating input score 50; 50th percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 5.7%; rating input score 30; 30th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: 2.4% per year; rating input score 100; 39th percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: 5.1% per year; rating input score 100; 48th percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: 3.7% per year; rating input score 100; 38th percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 84.3% of revenue deployed · 79.1% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: 4 of 7 board members independent · 3 of 9 filing controls reported
  • Programs: 1 filed program accomplishment · $109K in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $4K · 7 people listed
  • Consistency: 22 of 22 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 3 filed schedules
  • Filing history: 15 filing years from 2010 to 2025
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Money network: 3 filed money-flow records
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • Moderate — Accountability: Governance controls: 6 of 9 not reported.
  • Review — Accountability: Independent voting board scored 57/100.
  • Moderate — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 30/100.
  • Review — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 50/100.