St Paul Art Collective

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
411309983
IRS 990-EZ coverage
2010–2025
Forms available
Form 990 2023, Form 990-EZ 2025
Location
Saint Paul, MN, USA
Rating confidence
Limited
Sector
Visual Arts Organizations

Reported finances

Revenue
$120,624
Expenses
$116,314
Assets
$20,344
Liabilities
$0

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

11 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • Veronica Hawman (Board President)
  • Camille Gonzalez (Board Vice President)
  • Mariusz Kujawski (Contract Executive Director)

People named in this filing

  • Veronica Hawman (Board President)
  • Camille Gonzalez (Board Vice President)
  • Thomas Burke (Board Treasurer)

Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

The St. Paul Art Collective primary program is the St. Paul Art Crawl twice a year that attract attendees and highlight local artists. The St. Paul Art Collective recognizes that Art is essential for a healthy and vibrant community by empowering artists of all genres through expanding connections and dimply opportunities.

What it reported doing in 2025

The St. Paul Art Collective operates the St. Paul Art Crawl hosting two annual art festivals that bring together a diverse range of artists businesses and community groups. These events play a vital role in creating access to the local art scene for thousands of community members who may face barriers to engaging with artists and their work. The festivals serve as a platform for artists to showcase their talents businesses to support the arts and residents to experience the richness of the local artistic community.

Operating model

Revenue model
Donor-supported. 77% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
Distribution model
Cannot be determined from the filing. The filing does not provide enough consistent spending detail to tell whether the nonprofit works directly or through others.

The verdict

- The available evidence is not sufficient to produce an overall rating for this filing. This is not a warning sign.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: NotEnoughData
  • Transparency & Controls: 91
  • Sustainability: 35
  • Growth: 0

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: Limited
  • Program expense ratio: Limited

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 88.9%; rating input score 89; 1st percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: 3.6%; rating input score 41; 41st percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.17; rating input score 17; 17th percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 0; rating input score 74; 74th percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 24.5%; rating input score 15; 15th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: -3.6% per year; rating input score 0; 22nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: -2.9% per year; rating input score 0; 11th percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: -9.5% per year; rating input score 0; 11th percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: Financial trends and filed revenue, expense, asset, and liability detail
  • Governance: Filed governance answers
  • Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment
  • Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 11 people listed
  • Consistency: 6 of 6 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 3 filed schedules
  • Filing history: 5 filing years from 2010 to 2025
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Money network: 1 filed money-flow record
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • High — Growth: Program expense growth scored 0/100.
  • High — Growth: Revenue growth scored 0/100.
  • Moderate — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 41/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 17/100.
  • High — Growth: Asset growth scored 0/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 15/100.