St Patricks's Day Parade Committee

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
263705211
IRS 990-EZ coverage
2010–2020
Forms available
Form 990-EZ 2020
Location
Jersey City, NJ, USA
Phone
2013200623
Rating
37
Verdict
REVIEW
Rating confidence
Moderate
Sector
Cultural, Ethnic Awareness

Reported finances

Revenue
$44,384
Expenses
$34,344
Assets
$75,765
Liabilities
$0

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2020. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

12 people listed

People named in this filing

  • MICHAEL MANZO (VICE-CHAIR)
  • MAUREEN HULINGS (CHAIRWOMAN)
  • JOAN CLEARLY (ADJUTANT)

Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2020. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

To educate and promote irish heritage through a st. Patricks day parade and an irish festival.

What it reported doing in 2020

The st. Patricks day parade is produced as an educational event with bagpipe competitions and lessons. The parade is televised on a local cable network and several guest speakers appear to discuss a variety of irish educational topics. The committee hosts a post parade lecture on the history of ireland and the irish influence in the city of jersey city, including but not limited to the irish politicians of jersey city, the irish immigration to jersey city and the mass immigration as a result of the irish potato famine. In addition the committee hold an irish festival which is a mecca of irish history and culture. Lessons on irish step dancing and the history and meaning behind the irish ballads are discussed and explained.

Operating model

Revenue model
Donor-supported. 82% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
Distribution model
No current program activity. The filing reports no program spending for the current year.

The verdict

REVIEW - The filed numbers largely add up and revenue comfortably covers expenses. A relatively small share of available resources goes toward mission work and a relatively small share of total spending goes to programs.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 0
  • Transparency & Controls: 82
  • Sustainability: 65
  • Growth: 20

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 0%; rating input score 0
  • Program expense ratio: 0%; rating input score 0

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 51st percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Limited

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: 22.6%; rating input score 71; 71st percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 2.21; rating input score 57; 57th percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 0; rating input score 73; 73rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 56; 56th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: -16.3% per year; rating input score 0; 28th percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: -13.5% per year; rating input score 0; 27th percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: 11.5% per year; rating input score 100; 74th percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 0% of revenue deployed · 0% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: Filed governance answers
  • Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment
  • Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 12 people listed
  • Consistency: 8 of 8 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 3 filed schedules
  • Filing history: 11 filing years from 2010 to 2020
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • High — Financial Efficiency: Mission deployment rate scored 0/100.
  • High — Financial Efficiency: Program expense ratio scored 0/100.
  • High — Growth: Program expense growth scored 0/100.
  • High — Growth: Revenue growth scored 0/100.
  • Review — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 57/100.
  • Review — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 56/100.