St Patrick Center
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 431263499
- IRS 990 coverage
- 2009–2024
- Forms available
- Form 990 2024
- Location
- St Louis, MO, USA
- Phone
- 3148020700
- Rating
- 82
- Verdict
- STRONG
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Affiliation
- Christianity
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $20,825,818
- Expenses
- $23,433,413
- Assets
- $18,300,446
- Liabilities
- $2,701,911
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
28 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- JARED BRYSON (PRESIDENT, CATHOLIC CHARITIES)
- CHRIS STEPHEN (CEO)
- MARK FRONMULLER (PRESIDENT)
- CAROL BECKEL (VICE PRESIDENT)
Highest reported compensation
- JARED BRYSON (PRESIDENT, CATHOLIC CHARITIES): $230,378 total reported compensation
- JONATHAN BELCHER (SR. DIRECTOR OF PROGRAMS, LONG-TERM TRANSFORMATION): $130,053 total reported compensation
- BRENT SIMNITT (SENIOR DIRECTOR OF IT & FACILITIES): $126,918 total reported compensation
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
St. Patrick center transforms lives through sustainable housing, employment and healthcare, following the compassion of jesus.
What it reported doing in 2024
Short-term transitions - a majority of the people who come to us are suffering in ways that require medium case management assistance and we provide them with rapid transitions to housing and shorter-term case management. Many of our clients reported no income when they first met us and employment assistance leading to financial stability is a great need in homeless services. Internal client training includes roots of success training to learn and be certified in training for "green" jobs, barista training, and janitorial on-the-job training. We served over 1,771 new households, with approximately 520 of those households consisting of veterans. We assisted 68 clients with securing permanent employment. Services are provided without charge to the recipients where applicable.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Earned-program. 71% of the money available for current operations came from fees and other program revenue.
- Distribution model
- Hybrid. The nonprofit split its reported program spending across 63% for direct work, 37% for grants, and 0% for affiliated organizations.
- Includes noncash contributions: Reported contributions include donated property or goods.
The verdict
STRONG - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Fundraising costs are high for each dollar raised and expenses are high relative to revenue.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 88
- Transparency & Controls: 75
- Accountability: 94
- Sustainability: 28
- Growth: 80
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 100%; rating input score 100
- Program expense ratio: 88.8%; rating input score 89
- Fundraising efficiency: $6.09 raised per $1 spent on fundraising; rating input score 25; 25th percentile among comparable filings
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 62nd percentile among comparable filings
- Pay-setting controls: 1 of 6 controls in place; rating input score 17
- Compensation committee: Missing
- Independent consultant: Missing
- Other Form 990s reviewed: Missing
- Written employment contract: Missing
- Compensation survey or study: Missing
- Board or committee approval: Pass
- Foreign activity oversight: Limited
- Grant itemization coverage: 100%; rating input score 100; 72nd percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
- Related-party transparency: Limited
Accountability
- Independent voting board: 89.5%; rating input score 89; 22nd percentile among comparable filings
- Governance controls: 9 of 9 controls in place; rating input score 100
- Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
- Whistleblower policy: Pass
- Document-retention policy: Pass
- CEO compensation review process: Pass
- Other executive compensation review process: Pass
- Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
- Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
- Audit committee oversight: Pass
- Independent financial-statement audit: Pass
Sustainability
- Operating margin: -12.5%; rating input score 8; 8th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.78; rating input score 28; 28th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.15; rating input score 66; 66th percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 3.2%; rating input score 67; 67th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: 4.8% per year; rating input score 100; 41st percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: 4.2% per year; rating input score 100; 36th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: -2.4% per year; rating input score 0; 5th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 100% of revenue deployed · 88.8% of spending went to programs
- Governance: 17 of 19 board members independent · 9 of 9 filing controls reported
- Programs: 4 filed program accomplishments · $20.8M in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $230K · 28 people listed · 1 of 6 pay-setting controls reported
- Highest-paid contractors: 1 contractor listed · $115K reported
- Consistency: 40 of 40 current checks pass
- Schedules: 9 filed schedules · includes major donors, grants, and executive pay
- Filing history: 16 filing years from 2009 to 2024
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: 6 filed money-flow records
- Related organizations: 11 filed related-organization links
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- High — Financial Efficiency: Fundraising efficiency scored 25/100.
- High — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 8/100.
- High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 28/100.
- High — Growth: Asset growth scored 0/100.