St Michael's Veterans Center Inc
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 900765963
- IRS 990 coverage
- 2016–2024
- Forms available
- Form 990 2024
- Location
- Kansas City, MO, USA
- Phone
- 8169210201
- Rating
- 83
- Verdict
- STRONG
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Housing Development, Construction, Management
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $568,007
- Expenses
- $460,896
- Assets
- $2,417,297
- Liabilities
- $216,229
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
8 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- ART FILLMORE (PRESIDENT)
- SUSAN ENGEL (EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR)
Highest reported compensation
- SUSAN ENGEL (EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR): $104,113 total reported compensation
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
St. Michael's veterans center (smvc) provides quality, affordable housing to veterans experiencing homelessness or living with a disability in the Kansas city area.(see expanded mission on schedule o)
What it reported doing in 2024
St. Michael's veterans center is a valued living community with an average of 90 percent of residents choosing st. Michael's as their home from year-to-year. In 2024, 130 veterans lived on the smvc campus and 100 percent maintained permanent housing. In 2024, 55 percent of smvc veterans worked one-on-one with social services to address personal goals around income and benefits, well-being, substance use, mental health, eviction prevention, socialization, legal, and transportation. 73 percent of their goals were met during 2024.(continued on schedule o)smvc provided social services to 92% (120) of smvc veterans including the following:- 88% used the food pantry - 88% enjoyed the coffee, community meals, and social activities - 83% used the dignity pantry - 79% received holiday and 100% birthday gifts- 34% participated in educational programs and field trips - 35% received household items - 44% completed tax returns / rent rebate returns - 21% created legal documents (wills, powers of attorney) this high level of stability is achieved because on-site professional services are designed to improve the quality of life and well-being of veterans along with housing permanency.smvc veterans note that for the first time they are part of a community that cares about them and their well-being. They feel safe. They connect with others that have had a shared experience. We believe that having a home and being a part of a community is essential for the dignity of each individual and collectively for the vibrancy and long-term sustainability of our city. And we all deserve to live with dignity. We've witnessed many lives that have changed because a veteran has a place to call home and a strong, supportive community. This impact is exemplified by frank's story. Frank is vietnam veteran who not only found a home and refuge at smvc, but also a way to give back. "st. Michael's saved my life," frank says. "i was isolated before. Here i have people to talk to and activities to get involved with. I love to help out. It makes me feel like i'm needed and part of something."
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Mixed. Its operating money came from several sources; no one source provided a clear majority.
- Distribution model
- Hybrid. The nonprofit split its reported program spending across 70% for direct work, and 30% for grants.
- Includes noncash contributions: Reported contributions include donated property or goods.
The verdict
STRONG - The filed numbers largely add up and a large share of available resources goes toward mission work. Fundraising costs are high for each dollar raised and some filing-based governance responses are negative or unanswered.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 70
- Transparency & Controls: 94
- Accountability: 90
- Sustainability: 67
- Growth: 100
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 67.9%; rating input score 68
- Program expense ratio: 83.7%; rating input score 84
- Fundraising efficiency: $9.56 raised per $1 spent on fundraising; rating input score 36; 36th percentile among comparable filings
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
- Pay-setting controls: Limited
- Foreign activity oversight: Limited
- Grant itemization coverage: 100%; rating input score 100; 76th percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
- Related-party transparency: Limited
Accountability
- Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
- Governance controls: 6 of 8 controls in place; rating input score 75
- Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
- Whistleblower policy: Fail
- Document-retention policy: Pass
- CEO compensation review process: Pass
- Other executive compensation review process: NotApplicable
- Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
- Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
- Audit committee oversight: Fail
- Independent financial-statement audit: Pass
Sustainability
- Operating margin: 18.9%; rating input score 75; 75th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 5.24; rating input score 85; 85th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.09; rating input score 44; 44th percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 22.6%; rating input score 12; 12th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: 10.3% per year; rating input score 100; 64th percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: 12.1% per year; rating input score 100; 72nd percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 20.3% per year; rating input score 100; 82nd percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 67.9% of revenue deployed · 83.7% of spending went to programs
- Governance: 6 of 6 board members independent · 6 of 8 filing controls reported
- Programs: 1 filed program accomplishment · $386K in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $104K · 8 people listed
- Consistency: 36 of 36 current checks pass
- Schedules: 8 filed schedules · includes major donors and grants
- Filing history: 8 filing years from 2016 to 2024
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: 1 filed money-flow record
- Related organizations: 6 filed related-organization links
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- Moderate — Financial Efficiency: Fundraising efficiency scored 36/100.
- Review — Accountability: Governance controls: 2 of 8 not reported.
- High — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 12/100.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 44/100.