SSM Health

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
370662580
IRS 990 coverage
2010–2024
Official website data refreshed
Sep 2026
Forms available
Form 990 2024, Form 990-T 2024
Location
Troy, MI, US
Phone
1-888-97CHART (1-888-972-4278)
Rating
70
Verdict
SUPPORTED
Rating confidence
Moderate
Sector
Hospital, General
Affiliation
Christianity

Official website

Reported finances

Revenue
$123,815,235
Expenses
$96,792,189
Assets
$128,285,902
Liabilities
$26,465,133

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

31 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • JEREMY FOTHERINGHAM (DIRECTOR, CHAIR, REGIONAL PRESIDENT)
  • DAMON HARBISON (DIRECTOR, HOSPITAL PRESIDENT)
  • STEVEN SMOOT (VICE PRESIDENT, COO AT SSM HEALTH)

Highest reported compensation

  • STEVEN SMOOT (VICE PRESIDENT, COO AT SSM HEALTH): $3,484,633 total reported compensation
  • DOUGLAS LONG (SECRETARY, CLO AT SSM HEALTH): $2,287,921 total reported compensation
  • JEREMY FOTHERINGHAM (DIRECTOR, CHAIR, REGIONAL PRESIDENT): $1,940,338 total reported compensation

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

Through our exceptional health care services, we reveal the healing presence of God.

What it reported doing in 2024

Ssm health st. Mary's hospital - centralia, operating in partnership with the felician sisters, is a 125-bed hospital with a strong history of over 100 years of community engagement. St. Mary's hospital delivers hospital services in inpatient, ambulatory surgery, outpatient, and emergency room settings. Key service lines include behavioral health, cancer, maternity, occupational medicine, weight management services, wound care, and many more. The hospital's surgery centers are equipped with the latest innovations in technology ensuring our patients have access to the most advanced treatment while staying close to home. To provide complete neurological care, our specialists are supported by board certified neuroradiologists, a full-service rehabilitation unit, a home health department, 24-hour mri service, neurodiagnostic equipment, and cardiac catheterization laboratories. Ssm health st. Mary's hospital - centralia also operates the little egypt breast and cervical cancer program and has been a lead agency for this Illinois public health program since 1998. The program often serves as a last resort for breast and cervical cancer screenings and education for women who are uninsured. For seven consecutive years, healthgrades has presented st. Mary's hospital the outstanding patient experience and critical care excellence awards. In 2014, quest by premier inc. Recognized st. Mary's hospital-centralia with the citation of merit award for high-value healthcare. In 2016, ssm health announced a $20 million renovation plan for st. Mary's hospital centralia, which will include interior and exterior upgrades, including expansion of the surgery department and improvements to the emergency department. St. Mary's hospital, centralia, Illinois also furthers its exempt purpose with the following activities: - operates an emergency room that is open to all persons regardless of ability to pay - has an open medical staff with privileges available to all qualified physicians in the area - has a governing body in which independent persons representative of the community comprise a majority- engages in the training and education of health care professionals- participates in medicaid, medicare, champus, tricare, and/or other government-sponsored health care programs - all surplus funds generated by ssmh entities are reinvested in improving our patient care delivery system.

Operating model

Revenue model
Other-operating. 98% of the money available for current operations came from other operating revenue.
Distribution model
Direct operator. The filing allocates 99% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.

The verdict

SUPPORTED - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Few specific pay-setting methods are documented in the filing; unanswered boxes are not proof of absence and a relatively small share of voting board members are independent.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 75
  • Transparency & Controls: 65
  • Accountability: 59
  • Sustainability: 65
  • Growth: 100

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 66%; rating input score 66
  • Program expense ratio: 84.4%; rating input score 84
  • Fundraising efficiency: $546.31 raised per $1 spent on fundraising; rating input score 94; 94th percentile among comparable filings

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 91.7%; rating input score 92; 8th percentile among comparable filings
  • Pay-setting controls: 0 of 6 controls in place; rating input score 0
    • Compensation committee: Missing
    • Independent consultant: Missing
    • Other Form 990s reviewed: Missing
    • Written employment contract: Missing
    • Compensation survey or study: Missing
    • Board or committee approval: Missing
  • Foreign activity oversight: Limited
  • Grant itemization coverage: 82.2%; rating input score 82; 18th percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
  • Related-party transparency: Limited

Accountability

  • Independent voting board: 53.8%; rating input score 54; 14th percentile among comparable filings
  • Governance controls: 6 of 9 controls in place; rating input score 67
    • Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
    • Whistleblower policy: Pass
    • Document-retention policy: Pass
    • CEO compensation review process: Fail
    • Other executive compensation review process: Fail
    • Form 990 shared with the board: Fail
    • Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
    • Audit committee oversight: Pass
    • Independent financial-statement audit: Pass

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: 21.8%; rating input score 88; 88th percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 1.33; rating input score 49; 49th percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.21; rating input score 68; 68th percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 6.8%; rating input score 8; 8th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: 1.3% per year; rating input score 100; 12th percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: 2.1% per year; rating input score 100; 14th percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: 6.9% per year; rating input score 100; 51st percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • What they do: 2 programs and campaigns described on the official site · 1 operating location identified
  • Where the money goes: 66% of revenue deployed · 84.4% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: 7 of 13 board members independent · 6 of 9 filing controls reported
  • Programs: 1 filed program accomplishment · $81.7M in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $3.5M · 31 people listed · 0 of 6 pay-setting controls reported
  • Highest-paid contractors: 5 contractors listed · $2.4M reported
  • Consistency: 33 of 34 current checks pass · 1 finding to review
  • Schedules: 9 filed schedules · includes major donors, grants, and executive pay
  • Filing history: 14 filing years from 2010 to 2024
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Money network: 9 filed money-flow records
  • Related organizations: 90 filed related-organization links
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • High — Transparency & Controls: Pay-setting controls scored 0/100.
  • Review — Accountability: Independent voting board scored 54/100.
  • Review — Accountability: Governance controls: 3 of 9 not reported.
  • Moderate — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 49/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 8/100.
  • Review — Transparency & Controls: Domestic grant itemization did not reconcile in the filed values.