St Mary's - Good Samaritan Inc

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
364170833
IRS 990-EZ coverage
2010–2024
Forms available
Form 990 2020, Form 990-EZ 2024, Form 990-T 2020
Location
St Louis, MO, USA
Phone
6184368000
Rating
88
Verdict
STRONG
Rating confidence
Moderate

Official website

Reported finances

Revenue
$14,561
Expenses
$28,924
Assets
$88,225
Liabilities
$0

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

12 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • JEREMY FOTHERINGHAM (CHAIR, PRESIDENT & DIRECTOR)

People named in this filing

  • JEAN BENOIT-HOULE MD (DIRECTOR)
  • MATTHEW FLANIGAN (DIRECTOR)
  • DAMON HARBISON (DIRECTOR)

Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

To improve access to health care and improve health in our communities.

What it reported doing in 2024

St. Mary's - good samaritan, inc. Is committed to the purpose of enabling its entities, ssm health st mary's hospital - centralia and ssm health good samaritan hospital - mt. Vernon to provide access to quality health care services to all persons on the southern Illinois region regardless of their ability to pay. Through its governance, operation and administration, st mary's - good samaritan, inc. Helps to meet the community needs identified by each hospital in an economic and efficient manner. The leaders of st. Mary's -good samaritan, inc. Participate in community organizations which enable them to identify community needs.

Operating model

Revenue model
Membership-supported. 100% of the money available for current operations came from membership dues.
Distribution model
Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.

The verdict

STRONG - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Expenses are high relative to revenue and program spending has declined or grown slowly.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 100
  • Transparency & Controls: 82
  • Sustainability: 40
  • Growth: 60

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 100%; rating input score 100
  • Program expense ratio: 100%; rating input score 100

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 52nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Limited

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: -98.6%; rating input score 8; 8th percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 3.05; rating input score 75; 75th percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 0; rating input score 68; 68th percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 56; 56th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: -9.9% per year; rating input score 0; 27th percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: 2.1% per year; rating input score 100; 60th percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: 10.4% per year; rating input score 100; 73rd percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 100% of revenue deployed · 100% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: Filed governance answers
  • Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment · $29K in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 12 people listed
  • Consistency: 8 of 8 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 2 filed schedules
  • Filing history: 6 filing years from 2010 to 2024
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Money network: 2 filed money-flow records
  • Related organizations: 84 filed related-organization links
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • High — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 8/100.
  • High — Growth: Program expense growth scored 0/100.
  • Review — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 56/100.