St. Mary's Community Services

Legal name: St Mary's Community Services

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
942687280
IRS 990 coverage
2014–2024
Official website data refreshed
Sep 2026
Forms available
Form 990 2024
Location
Stockton, CA, US
Phone
(209) 467-0703
Rating
72
Verdict
SUPPORTED
Rating confidence
Moderate
Sector
Congregate Meals

Official website

Reported finances

Revenue
$21,013,620
Expenses
$9,097,344
Assets
$31,700,804
Liabilities
$8,499,383

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

14 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • ANITRA WILLIAMS (PRESIDENT)
  • DANIELLE TIBON (VICE PRESIDENT)
  • ROCIO HOUSE (IMMED. PAST PRESIDENT)
  • PETRA LINDEN (EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR)

Highest reported compensation

  • PETRA LINDEN (EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR): $153,831 total reported compensation

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

At the core of every interaction on our campus is respect and dignity. We value every guest and walk together with them to meet their needs.

What it reported doing in 2024

Resource center - the social services program provides case management services to clients of the agency. Services include assistance with completing applications for various benefit programs, assistance locating housing, immigration issues, assistance translating documents and general assistance with navigating other agencies both private and governmental. This program partners with the court system and other partners in providing our community's only homeless court. This court provides homeless clients with the opportunity to pay fines through completing community service volunteer hours. The program also hosts aa, na and victims of domestic violence support groups. In 2024, we assisted more than 600 unduplicated clients with more than 6,000 visits to our social services department. In addition, the outreach team contacted more than 2,500 unduplicated homeless individuals located in encampments in the community.

Operating model

Revenue model
Donor-supported. 66% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
Distribution model
Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.

The verdict

SUPPORTED - The filed numbers largely add up and most voting board members are independent. A relatively small share of available resources goes toward mission work and some filing-based governance responses are negative or unanswered.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 59
  • Transparency & Controls: 66
  • Accountability: 95
  • Sustainability: 83
  • Growth: 100

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 37.9%; rating input score 38
  • Program expense ratio: 83%; rating input score 83
  • Fundraising efficiency: $157.18 raised per $1 spent on fundraising; rating input score 89; 89th percentile among comparable filings

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 62nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Pay-setting controls: 1 of 6 controls in place; rating input score 17
    • Compensation committee: Missing
    • Independent consultant: Missing
    • Other Form 990s reviewed: Missing
    • Written employment contract: Missing
    • Compensation survey or study: Missing
    • Board or committee approval: Pass
  • Foreign activity oversight: Limited
  • Grant itemization coverage: Limited
  • Major donor itemization: Limited
  • Related-party transparency: Limited

Accountability

  • Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 66th percentile among comparable filings
  • Governance controls: 7 of 8 controls in place; rating input score 88
    • Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
    • Whistleblower policy: Pass
    • Document-retention policy: Fail
    • CEO compensation review process: Pass
    • Other executive compensation review process: NotApplicable
    • Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
    • Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
    • Audit committee oversight: Pass
    • Independent financial-statement audit: Pass

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: 56.7%; rating input score 95; 95th percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 3.48; rating input score 79; 79th percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.27; rating input score 50; 50th percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 1.7%; rating input score 79; 79th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: 15% per year; rating input score 100; 83rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: 23% per year; rating input score 100; 94th percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: 9.7% per year; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • What they do: 8 programs and campaigns described on the official site · 2 operating locations identified
  • Where the money goes: 37.9% of revenue deployed · 83% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: 13 of 13 board members independent · 7 of 8 filing controls reported
  • Programs: 7 filed program accomplishments · $7.5M in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $154K · 14 people listed · 1 of 6 pay-setting controls reported
  • Consistency: 30 of 30 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 6 filed schedules · includes executive pay
  • Filing history: 10 filing years from 2014 to 2024
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Money network: 1 filed money-flow record
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • Moderate — Financial Efficiency: Mission deployment rate scored 38/100.
  • Review — Accountability: Governance controls: Document-retention policy not reported.
  • Review — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 50/100.