St Margaret Foundation
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 251520340
- IRS 990 coverage
- 2009–2025
- Forms available
- Form 990 2025, Form 990-T 2024
- Location
- Pittsburgh, PA, USA
- Phone
- 4127844205
- Rating
- 73
- Verdict
- SUPPORTED
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Single Organization Support
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $4,144,534
- Expenses
- $1,777,333
- Assets
- $38,431,942
- Liabilities
- $114,106
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
20 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- MARY LEE GANNON (PRESIDENT)
Highest reported compensation
- MARY LEE GANNON (PRESIDENT): $308,051 total reported compensation
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
The mission of st. Margaret foundation is to be a valued source of support for upmc st. Margaret and the health and wellness of the communities it serves. The foundation focuses on filling in the gaps with hope for patients at st. Margaret hospital who are facing some of life's greatest challenges.
What it reported doing in 2025
The foundation is a public charity governed by its board of directors and is independent of upmc. St. Margaret foundation is a two-pronged organization: 1.) raising funds to help patients in crisis with hope healing and independence; and 2.) making grants to help facilitate programs that help patients in crisis.in today's health care environment many patient needs cannot be met with medicare, medicaid, insurance and self-payment alone. St. Margaret foundation fundraises for specific areas of need that include: the patient crisis care endowment, which provides underserved patients with medical supplies, emergency housing, medication, and much more; the oncology fund for patients battling cancer to help with transportation, medication, and utility assistance due to loss of wages; the st. Margaret family health centers fund for locations in lawrenceville, bloomfield-garfield, and new kensington which provides underserved patients with immunizations, medications, reach out and read books for children, teddy bear clinic, food vouchers for holiday meals, health fairs, and nutrition education and human sexuality education in the city public schools; and the employee emergency fund which assists employees of st. Margaret who have experienced a natural disaster or medical emergency. St. Margaret foundation also makes grants to programs that improve the health of the st. Margaret community. Examples include: free rides for seniors shuttle service, free valet service for seniors and patients with disabilities, kathleen's cupboard free food pantry, health fair screenings for the under-resourced, and free flu immunizations for seniors.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Mixed. Its operating money came from several sources; no one source provided a clear majority.
- Distribution model
- Grant intermediary. The nonprofit sent 82% of its reported program spending out as grants.
- Includes noncash contributions: Reported contributions include donated property or goods.
The verdict
SUPPORTED - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and most voting board members are independent. The filing reports few safeguards for money sent abroad and fundraising costs are high for each dollar raised.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 65
- Transparency & Controls: 60
- Accountability: 100
- Sustainability: 85
- Growth: 100
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 68.9%; rating input score 69
- Program expense ratio: 68.1%; rating input score 68
- Fundraising efficiency: $9.23 raised per $1 spent on fundraising; rating input score 33; 33rd percentile among comparable filings
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 94.4%; rating input score 94; 25th percentile among comparable filings
- Pay-setting controls: 1 of 6 controls in place; rating input score 17
- Compensation committee: Missing
- Independent consultant: Missing
- Other Form 990s reviewed: Missing
- Written employment contract: Missing
- Compensation survey or study: Missing
- Board or committee approval: Pass
- Foreign activity oversight: Scored; rating input score 0
- Grant itemization coverage: 91.8%; rating input score 92; 33rd percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
- Related-party transparency: Limited
Accountability
- Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
- Governance controls: 8 of 8 controls in place; rating input score 100
- Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
- Whistleblower policy: Pass
- Document-retention policy: Pass
- CEO compensation review process: Pass
- Other executive compensation review process: NotApplicable
- Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
- Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
- Audit committee oversight: Pass
- Independent financial-statement audit: Pass
Sustainability
- Operating margin: 57.1%; rating input score 93; 93rd percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 21.62; rating input score 95; 95th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0; rating input score 85; 85th percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 13.2%; rating input score 25; 25th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: 4.4% per year; rating input score 100; 32nd percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: 8.2% per year; rating input score 100; 58th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 4.1% per year; rating input score 100; 28th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 68.9% of revenue deployed · 68.1% of spending went to programs
- Governance: 19 of 19 board members independent · 8 of 8 filing controls reported
- Programs: 1 filed program accomplishment · $1.2M in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $308K · 20 people listed · 1 of 6 pay-setting controls reported
- Consistency: 35 of 36 current checks pass · 1 finding to review
- Schedules: 9 filed schedules · includes major donors, foreign activity, grants, and executive pay
- Filing history: 15 filing years from 2009 to 2025
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: 16 filed money-flow records
- Related organizations: 14 filed related-organization links
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- High — Transparency & Controls: Foreign activity oversight scored 0/100.
- Moderate — Financial Efficiency: Fundraising efficiency scored 33/100.
- High — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 25/100.
- Review — Transparency & Controls: Domestic grant itemization did not reconcile in the filed values.