St Louis Pro Players Inc
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 463146640
- IRS 990-EZ coverage
- 2018–2023
- Forms available
- Form 990-EZ 2023, Form 990-N 2016
- Location
- St Louis, MO, USA
- Phone
- 3173240647
- Rating
- 63
- Verdict
- SUPPORTED
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Fund Raising and Fund Distribution
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $56,731
- Expenses
- $69,764
- Assets
- $56,797
- Liabilities
- $30,000
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2023. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
4 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- PETER WOODS (PRESIDENT)
- LARRY FROST (VICE PRESIDENT)
People named in this filing
- PETER WOODS (PRESIDENT)
- LARRY FROST (VICE PRESIDENT)
- DAVID BRADER (SECRETARY)
Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2023. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
Primary exempt purpose - raise money for underprivileged youth in saint louis
What it reported doing in 2023
Golf tournamentmission: beyond st louis school, arc angels foundation and boys hope girls hope of stl
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Other-operating. 86% of the money available for current operations came from other operating revenue.
- Distribution model
- Cannot be determined from the filing. The filing does not provide enough consistent spending detail to tell whether the nonprofit works directly or through others.
The verdict
SUPPORTED - The filed numbers largely add up. A relatively small share of total spending goes to programs and some filed totals do not add up.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 56
- Transparency & Controls: 82
- Sustainability: 30
- Growth: 20
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 60.6%; rating input score 61
- Program expense ratio: 49.3%; rating input score 49
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 51st percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Limited
Sustainability
- Operating margin: -23%; rating input score 23; 23rd percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.81; rating input score 40; 40th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.53; rating input score 9; 9th percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 56; 56th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: -1.6% per year; rating input score 0; 45th percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: -1.9% per year; rating input score 0; 46th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 10.2% per year; rating input score 100; 72nd percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 60.6% of revenue deployed · 49.3% of spending went to programs
- Governance: Filed governance answers
- Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment · $34K in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 4 people listed
- Consistency: 8 of 9 current checks pass · 1 finding to review
- Schedules: 2 filed schedules
- Filing history: 6 filing years from 2018 to 2023
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: Resolved incoming and outgoing counterparties from filed money flows.
- Related organizations: Filed and resolved organization relationships.
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- Moderate — Financial Efficiency: Program expense ratio scored 49/100.
- Moderate — Transparency & Controls: Part III transfer expenses within program total did not reconcile in the filed values.
- High — Growth: Program expense growth scored 0/100.
- High — Growth: Revenue growth scored 0/100.
- High — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 23/100.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 40/100.
- High — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 9/100.
- Review — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 56/100.