St Louis Integrated Health Network
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 203288245
- IRS 990 coverage
- 2009–2024
- Forms available
- Form 990 2024
- Location
- St Louis, MO, USA
- Phone
- 3146571483
- Rating
- 87
- Verdict
- STRONG
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Research Institutes and/or Public Policy Analysis
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $8,491,075
- Expenses
- $8,104,133
- Assets
- $6,488,766
- Liabilities
- $3,888,284
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
14 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- ANDWELE JOLLY (CEO)
Highest reported compensation
- ANDWELE JOLLY (CEO): $364,541 total reported compensation
- RYAN BARKER (CHIEF PROGRAM & POLICY OFFICER): $141,259 total reported compensation
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
The st. Louis integrated health network, through partnership and collaboration, is a healthcare intermediary building capacity across sectors to improve wellbeing by increasing access to health and social services.
What it reported doing in 2024
The community - clinical integration pillar includes two major initiatives: 1) care transitions initiative - the care transitions initiative (formerly known as community referral coordinator (crc) program and p.u.l.s.e. Program) is used to assist patients/community members to understand the levels of care available in the community and when and how to engage. It is a tiered, community intervention program at the patient level through the community referral coordinator program and at the systems level through the transitions of care (toc) task force. The crc program uses community referral coordinators to connect patients in inpatient units and/or emergency departments of hospitalscontinued on schedule owith a primary care provider for follow-up and preventative care. The community referral coordinator program's work to ensure established community health center patients are reconnected to their primary care homes as well as help those identified patients with chronic diseases establish pcp care following a hospitalization. The goals of the program are to (a) enhance access to a primary care home and health resources for all patients regardless of ability to pay, (b) reduce non-emergent use of emergency departments and low acuity readmissions, (c) enhance continuity of care, and (d) strengthen communications/processes among safety net providers. The toc task force is a cross-functional and collaborative group that works to foster effective transitions of care for patients. The toc task force is charged with oversight of the crc program. 2) the justice initiative includes the re-entry community linkages (re-link) program which works to improve the health outcomes for those reentering community from jail or prison by utilizing collaborative community efforts through a health and social services network comprised of physical health, behavioral health, and social support service partners. The goals are to (a) improve coordination and linkages among criminal justice, public health, social service, and private entities to address health care and health care access of community re-entrants, (b) reduce health disparities experienced by the reentry and justice-involved population, (c) increase access to needed public health, behavioral health, health care coverage, and social services, and (d) reduce recidivism. The justice initiative also includes the health and social service network table of partner organizations that work to address system barriers to successful prevention of incarceration and re-entry and the transitions clinic model which is a partnership with health centers in our region to provide a half-day clinic each week to specifically serve those people reentering the community from jail or prison.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Mixed. Its operating money came from several sources; no one source provided a clear majority.
- Distribution model
- Hybrid. The nonprofit split its reported program spending across 63% for direct work, and 37% for grants.
The verdict
STRONG - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Expenses are high relative to revenue and total assets are small relative to annual expenses; liquid coverage is unknown.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 91
- Transparency & Controls: 83
- Accountability: 95
- Sustainability: 39
- Growth: 100
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 88.7%; rating input score 89
- Program expense ratio: 92.9%; rating input score 93
- Fundraising efficiency: $501.81 raised per $1 spent on fundraising; rating input score 96; 96th percentile among comparable filings
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
- Pay-setting controls: 3 of 6 controls in place; rating input score 50
- Compensation committee: Missing
- Independent consultant: Missing
- Other Form 990s reviewed: Pass
- Written employment contract: Pass
- Compensation survey or study: Missing
- Board or committee approval: Pass
- Foreign activity oversight: Limited
- Grant itemization coverage: 99.8%; rating input score 100; 41st percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
- Related-party transparency: Limited
Accountability
- Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
- Governance controls: 8 of 9 controls in place; rating input score 89
- Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
- Whistleblower policy: Pass
- Document-retention policy: Pass
- CEO compensation review process: Pass
- Other executive compensation review process: Fail
- Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
- Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
- Audit committee oversight: Pass
- Independent financial-statement audit: Pass
Sustainability
- Operating margin: 4.6%; rating input score 49; 49th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.8; rating input score 30; 30th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.6; rating input score 17; 17th percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 6.2%; rating input score 46; 46th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: 18.2% per year; rating input score 100; 83rd percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: 11.8% per year; rating input score 100; 74th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 10.7% per year; rating input score 100; 61st percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 88.7% of revenue deployed · 92.9% of spending went to programs
- Governance: 12 of 12 board members independent · 8 of 9 filing controls reported
- Programs: 4 filed program accomplishments · $7.5M in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $365K · 14 people listed · 3 of 6 pay-setting controls reported
- Highest-paid contractors: 1 contractor listed · $198K reported
- Consistency: 35 of 35 current checks pass
- Schedules: 7 filed schedules · includes major donors, grants, and executive pay
- Filing history: 15 filing years from 2009 to 2024
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: 14 filed money-flow records
- Related organizations: 11 filed related-organization links
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
- Staff and benefit plans: Retirement and health plans the organization files with the Department of Labor, and the people in them.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 49/100.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 30/100.
- Review — Accountability: Governance controls: Other executive compensation review process not reported.
- High — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 17/100.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 46/100.