St Joseph Services Corporation
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 742455161
- IRS 990 coverage
- 2010–2024
- Forms available
- Form 990 2024
- Location
- Phoenix, AZ, USA
- Phone
- 9797763777
- Rating
- 76
- Verdict
- SUPPORTED
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Single Organization Support
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $7,435,600
- Expenses
- $7,435,600
- Assets
- $42,576,420
- Liabilities
- $57,124,001
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
21 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- T DOUGLAS LAWSON PHD (PRESIDENT, SOUTH REGION (THRU 2/21/25))
- MONTE BOSTWICK (MARKET PRESIDENT)
- KIM SHAW (PRESIDENT/CEO (THRU 2/7/25))
- JOHN WILLIAMS MD (BOARD MEMBER/ PRESIDENT OF MEDICAL STAFF)
Highest reported compensation
- T DOUGLAS LAWSON PHD (PRESIDENT, SOUTH REGION (THRU 2/21/25)): $3,876,407 total reported compensation
- MONTE BOSTWICK (MARKET PRESIDENT): $1,051,092 total reported compensation
- KIM SHAW (PRESIDENT/CEO (THRU 2/7/25)): $988,635 total reported compensation
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
As an affiliate of commonspirit health, we make the healing presence of god known in our world by improving the health of the people we serve, especially those who are vulnerable, while we advance social justice for all.
What it reported doing in 2024
St. Joseph services corporation is organized and operated, within the meaning of section 509(a)(3)(a) of the internal revenue code of 1986, as now in effect or as subsequently amended ("irc"), exclusively for the benefit of, to perform the functions of, and/or to carry out the religious, charitable, scientific, and educational purposes within the meaning of section 501(c)(3) of the irc, of catholic health federation ("chcf"), a public juridic person within the meaning of the code of canon law for the roman catholic church ("canon law"), including by supporting such other charitable organizations, the purposes of which are to embody the mission of the healing ministry of jesus in the chuch through ownership, management, or goverance of health ministries, or the offering of or supporting of charitable and religious programs or services consistent with such purposes, in keeping with the gospel imperative.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Earned-program. 100% of the money available for current operations came from fees and other program revenue.
- Distribution model
- Hybrid. The nonprofit split its reported program spending across 48% for direct work, 3% for grants, and 49% for affiliated organizations.
The verdict
SUPPORTED - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Few specific pay-setting methods are documented in the filing; unanswered boxes are not proof of absence and some filing-based governance responses are negative or unanswered.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 76
- Transparency & Controls: 74
- Accountability: 80
- Sustainability: 47
- Growth: 100
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 86.4%; rating input score 86
- Program expense ratio: 86.4%; rating input score 86
- Fundraising efficiency: Limited
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
- Pay-setting controls: 0 of 6 controls in place; rating input score 0
- Compensation committee: Missing
- Independent consultant: Missing
- Other Form 990s reviewed: Missing
- Written employment contract: Missing
- Compensation survey or study: Missing
- Board or committee approval: Missing
- Foreign activity oversight: Limited
- Grant itemization coverage: 100%; rating input score 100; 44th percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Limited
- Related-party transparency: Yes; rating input score 100
Accountability
- Independent voting board: 81.2%; rating input score 81; 15th percentile among comparable filings
- Governance controls: 7 of 9 controls in place; rating input score 78
- Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
- Whistleblower policy: Pass
- Document-retention policy: Pass
- CEO compensation review process: Fail
- Other executive compensation review process: Fail
- Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
- Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
- Audit committee oversight: Pass
- Independent financial-statement audit: Pass
Sustainability
- Operating margin: 0%; rating input score 33; 33rd percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 5.73; rating input score 85; 85th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 1.34; rating input score 2; 2nd percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 5.4%; rating input score 51; 51st percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: 10.6% per year; rating input score 100; 66th percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: 3.4% per year; rating input score 100; 30th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 22.7% per year; rating input score 100; 87th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 86.4% of revenue deployed · 86.4% of spending went to programs
- Governance: 13 of 16 board members independent · 7 of 9 filing controls reported
- Programs: 1 filed program accomplishment · $6.4M in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $3.9M · 21 people listed · 0 of 6 pay-setting controls reported
- Consistency: 25 of 25 current checks pass
- Schedules: 6 filed schedules · includes grants, executive pay, and related organizations
- Filing history: 15 filing years from 2010 to 2024
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: 2 filed money-flow records
- Related organizations: 330 filed related-organization links
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- High — Transparency & Controls: Pay-setting controls scored 0/100.
- Review — Accountability: Governance controls: 2 of 9 not reported.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 33/100.
- High — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 2/100.
- Review — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 51/100.