St John's Lane Elementary School Parent Teacher Association Inc
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 521333666
- IRS 990-EZ coverage
- 2017–2024
- Forms available
- Form 990-EZ 2024, Form 990-N 2016
- Location
- Ellicott City, MD, USA
- Phone
- 9196238803
- Rating
- 77
- Verdict
- SUPPORTED
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $41,856
- Expenses
- $41,311
- Assets
- $39,195
- Liabilities
- $0
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
4 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- Julie Slater (President)
- Christian Buzzerd (Vice President)
People named in this filing
- Julie Slater (President)
- Claire Mathews (Treasurer)
- Sarah Day (Secretary)
Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
To engage families and communities to advocate for children. To promote the welfare of the children and youth in home, school and community. To raise the standards of home life. To advocate for laws that further the education, physical and mental health, welfare and safety of children and youth. To promote the collaboration and engagement of families and educators in the education of children and youth. To engage the public in united efforts to secure the physical mental emotional and social well being of all children and youth. To advocate for fiscal responsibility regarding public tax dollars in public education fundraising.
What it reported doing in 2024
Support provided for community building events for students, parents, and educators outside of the normal student day
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Other-operating. 82% of the money available for current operations came from other operating revenue.
- Distribution model
- Hybrid. The nonprofit split its reported program spending across 73% for direct work, and 27% for grants.
The verdict
SUPPORTED - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Expenses are high relative to revenue and total assets are small relative to annual expenses; liquid coverage is unknown.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 74
- Transparency & Controls: 82
- Sustainability: 50
- Growth: 100
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 74.1%; rating input score 74
- Program expense ratio: 75%; rating input score 75
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 52nd percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Limited
Sustainability
- Operating margin: 1.3%; rating input score 48; 48th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.95; rating input score 45; 45th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0; rating input score 68; 68th percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 56; 56th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: 4.6% per year; rating input score 100; 61st percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: 9.3% per year; rating input score 100; 80th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 5.2% per year; rating input score 100; 59th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 74.1% of revenue deployed · 75% of spending went to programs
- Governance: Filed governance answers
- Accomplishments: 6 filed program accomplishments · $31K in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 4 people listed
- Consistency: 9 of 9 current checks pass
- Schedules: 3 filed schedules
- Filing history: 7 filing years from 2017 to 2024
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: Resolved incoming and outgoing counterparties from filed money flows.
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 48/100.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 45/100.
- Review — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 56/100.