St John Neumann Catholic School Fou

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
990955556
IRS 990-EZ coverage
2025–2025
Forms available
Form 990-EZ 2025, Form 990-N 2024
Location
Pueblo, CO, USA
Phone
7193696092
Rating
51
Verdict
MIXED
Rating confidence
Moderate
Sector
Single Organization Support

Reported finances

Revenue
$198,424
Expenses
$22,214
Assets
$239,155
Liabilities
$5,855

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

4 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • MICHAEL SALARDINO (PRESIDENT)

People named in this filing

  • MICHAEL SALARDINO (PRESIDENT)
  • DAVE LYTLE (VICE PRESIDE)
  • PATTY ERJAVEC (TREASURER)

Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

Our mission is to nurture and challenge each student's mind, body, and spirit to a lifetime of excellence and passionate christianity.

What it reported doing in 2025

The purpose of the "spirit of the champion" fundraiser(s) is to generate financial support for programs that develop and support student initiatives for the st. John neumann catholic school the spirit of a champion fundraiser(s) advances the mission of st. John neumann catholic school by raising critical funds to support academic excellence, faith formation, student programs, and tuition assistance. The event has strengthened community engagement, expanded opportunities for students, and helped ensure the long-term success of catholic education in pueblo. The funds are distributed to sjncs on an as-needed basis.

Operating model

Revenue model
Donor-supported. 67% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
Distribution model
Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.

The verdict

MIXED - The filed numbers largely add up and revenue comfortably covers expenses. A relatively small share of available resources goes toward mission work and a relatively small share of total spending goes to programs.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 13
  • Transparency & Controls: 100
  • Sustainability: 86
  • Growth: NotEnoughData

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 3%; rating input score 3
  • Program expense ratio: 29.1%; rating input score 29

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 52nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: 88.8%; rating input score 99; 99th percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 10.77; rating input score 98; 98th percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.02; rating input score 31; 31st percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 63; 63rd percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: Limited
  • Revenue growth: Limited
  • Asset growth: Limited

Details

  • Where the money goes: 3% of revenue deployed · 29.1% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: Filed governance answers
  • Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment · $6K in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 4 people listed
  • Consistency: 7 of 7 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 3 filed schedules
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • High — Financial Efficiency: Mission deployment rate scored 3/100.
  • High — Financial Efficiency: Program expense ratio scored 29/100.
  • Moderate — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 31/100.