St Hugh-st Elizabeth Baseball League Inc
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 113250932
- IRS 990-EZ coverage
- 2014–2019
- Forms available
- Form 990-EZ 2019
- Location
- Huntington Station, NY, USA
- Phone
- 6316736676
- Rating
- 67
- Verdict
- SUPPORTED
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Baseball, Softball
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $21,096
- Expenses
- $32,804
- Assets
- $0
- Liabilities
- $0
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2019. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
7 people listed
People named in this filing
- MARIAN LAYER (COMMISSIONER)
- ROBERT WOODWARD (RECORDING SECRETARY)
- ARTIE COSTANZO (UMPIRE COORDINATOR)
Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2019. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
To introduce the great game of baseball & softball to our youngsters by providing instruction, at various levels, of the games fundamental skills and to instill basic values such as: teamwork, sportsmanship, respect for themselves and others, integrity, and confidence, while providing a safe and fun atmosphere.
What it reported doing in 2019
To provide a baseball and softball league for the children in the community to participate in and to promote education and team sportsmanship including understanding of the sports of baseball and softball.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Earned-program. 100% of the money available for current operations came from fees and other program revenue.
- Distribution model
- Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
The verdict
SUPPORTED - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. A relatively small share of total spending goes to programs and expenses are high relative to revenue.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 68
- Transparency & Controls: 82
- Sustainability: 13
- Growth: 0
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 78.3%; rating input score 78
- Program expense ratio: 50.3%; rating input score 50
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 51st percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Limited
Sustainability
- Operating margin: -55.5%; rating input score 12; 12th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 0; rating input score 2; 2nd percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: Limited
- Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 56; 56th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: -24.9% per year; rating input score 0; 16th percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: -23.3% per year; rating input score 0; 13th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: -43.6% per year; rating input score 0; 4th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 78.3% of revenue deployed · 50.3% of spending went to programs
- Governance: Filed governance answers
- Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment · $17K in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 7 people listed
- Consistency: 8 of 8 current checks pass
- Schedules: 3 filed schedules
- Filing history: 6 filing years from 2014 to 2019
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- Review — Financial Efficiency: Program expense ratio scored 50/100.
- High — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 12/100.
- High — Growth: Program expense growth scored 0/100.
- High — Growth: Revenue growth scored 0/100.
- High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 2/100.
- High — Growth: Asset growth scored 0/100.
- Review — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 56/100.