St Gregorys Pantry Inc
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 208689666
- IRS 990 coverage
- 2010–2025
- Forms available
- Form 990 2025
- Location
- Mantoloking, NJ, USA
- Phone
- 7328928105
- Rating
- 74
- Verdict
- SUPPORTED
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Food Banks, Pantries
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $321,327
- Expenses
- $191,048
- Assets
- $1,401,836
- Liabilities
- $0
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
4 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- SUE DEITZ (President)
- SANDRA MCINTYRE (Vice President)
People named in this filing
- SUE DEITZ (President)
- GAIL DUNN (Secretary)
- SANDRA MCINTYRE (Vice President)
Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
A community of committed volunteers representing the various community churches in the greater point pleasant area devoting time and energy to provide temporary relief and basic necessities to those in need.
What it reported doing in 2025
More than 40 years ago, the secretary at st. Marys by the sea episcopal church in point pleasant beach, nj prepared a box of food for a family in need. With that act of kindness the foundation of st. Gregorys pantry was formed.over the years, volunteers came to help; individuals, businesses and community organizations contributed food and money, and everyone had the same thought we are an affluent community; if we have families who are struggling, we need to help.fast forward to today and st. Gregorys pantry has evolved into something much bigger than dorothy, the church secretary, ever imagined. Today, st. Gregorys has over 250 volunteers, is open five days a week and has three major holiday distributions.the pantry is a 100% volunteer organizationapproximately six volunteers work every weekdaythe holiday distributions include volunteers from area schools, boy scouts, girl scouts, sports teams and many other organizationsst. Gregorys pantry serves about 50 families per weekeach holiday distribution serves approximately 300 familiesthe holiday distributions include filled baskets at easter, and new toys and gifts for children at christmasour volunteersst. Gregorys pantry volunteers range in age from kindergarteners who make holiday cards, to high school students who carry cases of food and make deliveries, to people who take the day off from work just to help, to retirees, who often work as hard as they did during their careers. The volunteers come from all walks of life; they are the core of the pantry. There is no one person who makes the pantry run it is a group effort that just seems to work.how we helpthrough the generosity and commitment of individuals, churches, businesses, schools, clubs, and various service organizations in our community, st. Gregorys pantry provides temporary aid to approximately 10,000 individuals annually.major distribution events are held during easter, thanksgiving and christmas: each distribution serves approximately 300 families.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Donor-supported. 79% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
- Distribution model
- Grant intermediary. The nonprofit sent 95% of its reported program spending out as grants.
The verdict
SUPPORTED - The filed numbers largely add up and a large share of available resources goes toward mission work. Some filing-based governance responses are negative or unanswered and program spending has declined or grown slowly.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 62
- Transparency & Controls: 94
- Accountability: 70
- Sustainability: 83
- Growth: 60
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 61%; rating input score 61
- Program expense ratio: 85.2%; rating input score 85
- Fundraising efficiency: Limited
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 64th percentile among comparable filings
- Pay-setting controls: Limited
- Foreign activity oversight: Limited
- Grant itemization coverage: 100%; rating input score 100; 81st percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
- Related-party transparency: Limited
Accountability
- Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 64th percentile among comparable filings
- Governance controls: 2 of 7 controls in place; rating input score 29
- Conflict-of-interest policy: Fail
- Whistleblower policy: Fail
- Document-retention policy: Fail
- CEO compensation review process: NotApplicable
- Other executive compensation review process: NotApplicable
- Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
- Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
- Audit committee oversight: Missing
- Independent financial-statement audit: Fail
Sustainability
- Operating margin: 40.5%; rating input score 87; 87th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 7.34; rating input score 86; 86th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0; rating input score 77; 77th percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 67; 67th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: -4.9% per year; rating input score 0; 16th percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: 1.5% per year; rating input score 100; 27th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 3.6% per year; rating input score 100; 38th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 61% of revenue deployed · 85.2% of spending went to programs
- Governance: 4 of 4 board members independent · 2 of 7 filing controls reported
- Programs: 1 filed program accomplishment · $163K in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 4 people listed
- Consistency: 19 of 19 current checks pass
- Schedules: 5 filed schedules · includes major donors and grants
- Filing history: 14 filing years from 2010 to 2025
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: Resolved incoming and outgoing counterparties from filed money flows.
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- High — Accountability: Governance controls: 4 of 6 not reported.
- High — Growth: Program expense growth scored 0/100.