St Gianna Molla Clinic Inc

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
465384168
IRS 990 coverage
2016–2024
Forms available
Form 990 2024, Form 990-EZ 2019
Location
De Pere, WI, USA
Phone
9206053115
Rating
82
Verdict
STRONG
Rating confidence
Moderate
Sector
Hospital, Specialty
Affiliation
Christianity

Reported finances

Revenue
$3,341,446
Expenses
$2,642,474
Assets
$3,147,533
Liabilities
$1,670,977

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

7 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • DR ROBIN GOLDSMITH (PRESIDENT)
  • DR ROBERT MCDONALD (VICE PRESIDENT)

Highest reported compensation

  • DR ROBIN GOLDSMITH (PRESIDENT): $69,231 total reported compensation

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

St. Gianna molla clinic, inc. Will be a teaching catholic clinic that serves all patients. The clinic will have dual primary missions of providing truly catholic medical care while educating patients and the community about the catholic faith, especially as it pertains to medicine. St. Gianna molla clinic, inc. Will treat the body, mind, and soal of each patient in a manner that honors the dignity of life from conception to natural end of life. St. Gianna molla clinic, inc. Will be completely faithful to its catholic identity and will true to the magisterium. Health care providers will always practice in a manner consistent with the moral teachings of the church.

What it reported doing in 2024

St. Gianna molla clinic, inc. Provides education to patients and the community about medicine consistent with the catholic faith, explaining why they believe what they believe. St. Gianna molla clinic, inc. Reaches out to the community and beyond to provide the very best medical education while maintaining and evangelizing its catholic identity.

Operating model

Revenue model
Mixed. Its operating money came from several sources; no one source provided a clear majority.
Distribution model
Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
  • Includes noncash contributions: Reported contributions include donated property or goods.

The verdict

STRONG - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Some filing-based governance responses are negative or unanswered and total assets are small relative to annual expenses; liquid coverage is unknown.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 79
  • Transparency & Controls: 92
  • Accountability: 76
  • Sustainability: 60
  • Growth: 100

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 72.5%; rating input score 73
  • Program expense ratio: 91.7%; rating input score 92
  • Fundraising efficiency: $26.95 raised per $1 spent on fundraising; rating input score 67; 67th percentile among comparable filings

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Pay-setting controls: Limited
  • Foreign activity oversight: Limited
  • Grant itemization coverage: Limited
  • Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
  • Related-party transparency: Limited

Accountability

  • Independent voting board: 85.7%; rating input score 86; 17th percentile among comparable filings
  • Governance controls: 5 of 8 controls in place; rating input score 62
    • Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
    • Whistleblower policy: Fail
    • Document-retention policy: Fail
    • CEO compensation review process: Fail
    • Other executive compensation review process: NotApplicable
    • Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
    • Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
    • Audit committee oversight: Pass
    • Independent financial-statement audit: Pass

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: 20.9%; rating input score 78; 78th percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 1.19; rating input score 43; 43rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.53; rating input score 19; 19th percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 2.6%; rating input score 72; 72nd percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: 28.7% per year; rating input score 100; 92nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: 34.5% per year; rating input score 100; 95th percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: 39% per year; rating input score 100; 96th percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 72.5% of revenue deployed · 91.7% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: 6 of 7 board members independent · 5 of 8 filing controls reported
  • Programs: 1 filed program accomplishment · $2.4M in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $69K · 7 people listed
  • Consistency: 31 of 31 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 4 filed schedules · includes major donors
  • Filing history: 6 filing years from 2016 to 2024
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Money network: 2 filed money-flow records
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • Review — Accountability: Governance controls: 3 of 8 not reported.
  • Moderate — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 43/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 19/100.