St Francis Wood Women's League

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
941597954
IRS 990-EZ coverage
2011–2024
Forms available
Form 990-EZ 2024, Form 990-N 2021
Location
San Francisco, CA, USA
Phone
4157599060
Rating
63
Verdict
SUPPORTED
Rating confidence
Moderate

Reported finances

Revenue
$13,452
Expenses
$12,649
Assets
$112,566
Liabilities
$0

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

9 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • MICHELLE CAMMARATA (VICE PRESIDENT)
  • JULIE SPENCE (PRESIDENT)

People named in this filing

  • CHRISTINA AMORIM (MEMBER AT LARGE)
  • CAROL CONTE (MEMBER AT LARGE)
  • LEA DUDUM (MEMBER AT LARGE)

Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

The primary and specific purpose for which this corporation isformed is to organize, maintain, and operate recreational facilities in st. Franciswood, san francisco, California, and to erect, construct, purchase, improve andrepair recreational facilities of a temporary and removable nature in st. Franciswood, san francisco, California, for the benefit of the surrounding community.the general purposes of operating recreational facilities are to provide instructionand training relating to physical education, to lessen neighborhood tensions, andto combat community deterioration and juvenile delinquency.

What it reported doing in 2024

1) construction of walking path at the upper fountain park 2) installation of bricks & medallions 3) hosting of neighborhood events for members to gather, build community relationships: fall coffee event, caroling in the wood, member cocktail party, spring fling and annual luncheon all accomplish these goals.

Operating model

Revenue model
Earned-program. 100% of the money available for current operations came from fees and other program revenue.
Distribution model
Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.

The verdict

SUPPORTED - The filed numbers largely add up and program spending has grown recently. A relatively small share of available resources goes toward mission work and a relatively small share of total spending goes to programs.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 44
  • Transparency & Controls: 82
  • Sustainability: 68
  • Growth: 100

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 42.7%; rating input score 43
  • Program expense ratio: 45.4%; rating input score 45

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 52nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Limited

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: 6%; rating input score 56; 56th percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 8.9; rating input score 91; 91st percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 0; rating input score 68; 68th percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 56; 56th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: 4.2% per year; rating input score 100; 60th percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: 5.1% per year; rating input score 100; 71st percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: 7.5% per year; rating input score 100; 66th percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 42.7% of revenue deployed · 45.4% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: Filed governance answers
  • Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment · $6K in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 9 people listed
  • Consistency: 8 of 8 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 2 filed schedules
  • Filing history: 11 filing years from 2011 to 2024
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • Moderate — Financial Efficiency: Mission deployment rate scored 43/100.
  • Moderate — Financial Efficiency: Program expense ratio scored 45/100.
  • Review — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 56/100.
  • Review — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 56/100.