St Francis Home for Young Men Inc

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
861114683
IRS 990 coverage
2025–2025
Forms available
Form 990 2025, Form 990-EZ 2024
Location
Monticello, NY, USA
Phone
6103510305
Rating
59
Verdict
MIXED
Rating confidence
Moderate

Official website

Reported finances

Revenue
$1,113,985
Expenses
$83,282
Assets
$1,376,524
Liabilities
$4,279

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

3 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • JOSEPH CAMPO (PRESIDENT)

Highest reported compensation

  • THOMAS LAMAR (SECRETARY): $1,900 total reported compensation

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

Home & shelter to provide a home like enviroment for young men in a religious atmosphere to foster personal and spiritual growth. St. Francis home can accommodate up to six men at a time. Every young man is requred to work and to maintain respsonible attitude and behavior learning to work together and to also share in the maintenance of the house. Domestic skills, including cooking and other house maintenance jobs to be done by each person. The goal of the st. Francis house is to prepare them for the future and provide a possitive attitude, to build self confidence, and working skills that they can take into the world to become productive and responsible adults. Over 350 young men over the years have come through the st. Francis house doors. Many have found resonsible jobs, made peace with their families, and gone back to school. A number of them are now successful in business and professional work.

What it reported doing in 2025

Home & shelter to provide a home like enviroment for young men in a religious atmosphere to foster personal and spiritual growth. St. Francis home can accommodate up to six men at a time.

Operating model

Revenue model
Donor-supported. 97% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
Distribution model
Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.

The verdict

MIXED - The filed numbers largely add up and most voting board members are independent. A relatively small share of available resources goes toward mission work and some filing-based governance responses are negative or unanswered.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 29
  • Transparency & Controls: 92
  • Accountability: 63
  • Sustainability: 89
  • Growth: 60

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 8.2%; rating input score 8
  • Program expense ratio: 72.9%; rating input score 73
  • Fundraising efficiency: Limited

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Pay-setting controls: Limited
  • Foreign activity oversight: Limited
  • Grant itemization coverage: Limited
  • Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
  • Related-party transparency: Limited

Accountability

  • Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 64th percentile among comparable filings
  • Governance controls: 1 of 8 controls in place; rating input score 12
    • Conflict-of-interest policy: Fail
    • Whistleblower policy: Fail
    • Document-retention policy: Fail
    • CEO compensation review process: NotApplicable
    • Other executive compensation review process: Fail
    • Form 990 shared with the board: Fail
    • Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
    • Audit committee oversight: Missing
    • Independent financial-statement audit: Fail

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: 92.5%; rating input score 99; 99th percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 16.53; rating input score 95; 95th percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 0; rating input score 68; 68th percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 2.3%; rating input score 54; 54th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: Limited
  • Revenue growth: 59.4% per year; rating input score 100; 97th percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: 45.5% per year; rating input score 100; 94th percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 8.2% of revenue deployed · 72.9% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: 3 of 3 board members independent · 1 of 8 filing controls reported
  • Programs: 1 filed program accomplishment · $61K in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $2K · 3 people listed
  • Consistency: 23 of 23 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 4 filed schedules · includes major donors
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • High — Financial Efficiency: Mission deployment rate scored 8/100.
  • High — Accountability: Governance controls: 6 of 7 not reported.
  • Review — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 54/100.