St Francis Home
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 410729978
- IRS 990 coverage
- 2009–2024
- Forms available
- Form 990 2024, Form 990-T 2020
- Location
- Phoenix, AZ, USA
- Phone
- 2186433000
- Rating
- 71
- Verdict
- SUPPORTED
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $8,180,143
- Expenses
- $6,570,807
- Assets
- $37,255,229
- Liabilities
- $8,960,909
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
15 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- DAVID JONES (BOARD MEMBER/MARKET PRESIDENT REG HOSPITALS)
- DAVID NELSON (PRESIDENT/CEO-PARTIAL YEAR)
- TERRY ANDERSON (PRESIDENT/CEO - EFFECTIVE 9-15-2025)
Highest reported compensation
- DAVID JONES (BOARD MEMBER/MARKET PRESIDENT REG HOSPITALS): $616,729 total reported compensation
- DAVID NELSON (PRESIDENT/CEO-PARTIAL YEAR): $517,225 total reported compensation
- TIM SCHNACK (MARKET CFO): $368,286 total reported compensation
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
As an affiliate of commonspirit health, we make the healing presence of god known in our world by improving the health of the people we serve, especially those who are vulnerable, while we advance social justice for all.
What it reported doing in 2024
St. Francis home was established in september 1952 as a non-profit, long term care provider. This 120-bed skilled nursing facility specializes in providing an individualized, home-like atmosphere for the residents. Units are divided into 20-bed neighborhoods, with separate kitchens, dining areas, living rooms, laundry facilities, etc. Residents can choose to get up when they want to and can order what they want for breakfast. St. Francis also offers inter-generational activities for the residents and youth in the community. The mission of st. Francis home is to care for the frail elderly members of our community with dignity and to advocate for their health care needs. In fiscal year 2014, st. Francis home put 40 of the 120 licensed beds on lay-away due to difficulties in recruiting adequate staffing to maintain safe quality care. Currently 80 beds are in use.as a tax-exempt 501(c)(3) long term care facility, st. Francis home is committed to serving the needs of community. St. Francis home requires residents to demonstrate the ability to pay the facility fees and charges, which are set by the state of Minnesota, but will assist in locating payer sources the resident may be eligible for. All residents are charged the same rates, based on their care levels, regardless of their payer source. St. Francis home is led by an eight-member governing board, the majority of whom are independent community representatives. Our board is dedicated to promoting the development of healthier communities, with a specific focus on the needs of senior citizens. St. Francis home is proud of its catholic heritage and its ability to provide direct and indirect support to the communities it serves.since the 1980's, st. Francis home has been actively involved with its sister corporation, st. Francis medical center, with community health collaboration. Several times, st. Francis has taken the lead in organizing community teams and focus groups to look at health issues, set priorities and plans for improvement. That commitment continues today with st. Francis' membership on the richland-wilkin healthy communities, inc board of directors, breckenridge active living committee, active task force, violence prevention task force and other community groups.st. Francis community benefit plan has been established in conjunction with its sister corporations of st. Francis medical center, appletree court, and the healthcare and wellness foundation. The plan is based on our understanding of unique communities' needs derived from collaborative needs assessments, focus groups, and surveys conducted with our community partners. St. Francis conducted a community health needs assessment in 2022 in conjunction with the public health departments from both wilkin county, mn and richland county, nd, as well as the two clinics in our community. The three main areas of need identified from the data collected were mental health, substance use, and health-related social needs.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Earned-program. 88% of the money available for current operations came from fees and other program revenue.
- Distribution model
- Cannot be determined from the filing. The program-spending lines do not add up, so the filing cannot show reliably whether the nonprofit works directly or through others.
The verdict
SUPPORTED - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Few specific pay-setting methods are documented in the filing; unanswered boxes are not proof of absence and program spending has declined or grown slowly.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 79
- Transparency & Controls: 65
- Accountability: 76
- Sustainability: 71
- Growth: 20
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 85.1%; rating input score 85
- Program expense ratio: 94.9%; rating input score 95
- Fundraising efficiency: Limited
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 92.9%; rating input score 93; 13th percentile among comparable filings
- Pay-setting controls: 0 of 6 controls in place; rating input score 0
- Compensation committee: Missing
- Independent consultant: Missing
- Other Form 990s reviewed: Missing
- Written employment contract: Missing
- Compensation survey or study: Missing
- Board or committee approval: Missing
- Foreign activity oversight: Limited
- Grant itemization coverage: Limited
- Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
- Related-party transparency: Limited
Accountability
- Independent voting board: 75%; rating input score 75; 13th percentile among comparable filings
- Governance controls: 7 of 9 controls in place; rating input score 78
- Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
- Whistleblower policy: Pass
- Document-retention policy: Pass
- CEO compensation review process: Fail
- Other executive compensation review process: Fail
- Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
- Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
- Audit committee oversight: Pass
- Independent financial-statement audit: Pass
Sustainability
- Operating margin: 19.7%; rating input score 76; 76th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 5.67; rating input score 85; 85th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.24; rating input score 40; 40th percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 5.7%; rating input score 49; 49th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: -1% per year; rating input score 0; 11th percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: -1.5% per year; rating input score 0; 7th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 5.7% per year; rating input score 100; 38th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 85.1% of revenue deployed · 94.9% of spending went to programs
- Governance: 6 of 8 board members independent · 7 of 9 filing controls reported
- Programs: 1 filed program accomplishment · $6.2M in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $617K · 15 people listed · 0 of 6 pay-setting controls reported
- Consistency: 26 of 27 current checks pass · 1 finding to review
- Schedules: 6 filed schedules · includes major donors and executive pay
- Filing history: 16 filing years from 2009 to 2024
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Related organizations: 328 filed related-organization links
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- High — Transparency & Controls: Pay-setting controls scored 0/100.
- High — Growth: Program expense growth scored 0/100.
- High — Growth: Revenue growth scored 0/100.
- Review — Accountability: Governance controls: 2 of 9 not reported.
- Review — Transparency & Controls: Schedule R controlled transactions itemized did not reconcile in the filed values.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 40/100.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 49/100.