St Francis Animal Protection Society
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 237167918
- IRS 990-EZ coverage
- 2013–2020
- Forms available
- Form 990-EZ 2020, Form 990-N 2020
- Location
- Campbell, CA, USA
- Phone
- 4159903580
- Rating
- 81
- Verdict
- STRONG
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Animal Protection and Welfare
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $84,225
- Expenses
- $79,139
- Assets
- $9,471
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2020. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
3 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- Kimberly McIntyre (President)
People named in this filing
- Kimberly McIntyre (President)
- Anastasia Peterson (Secretary)
- Caitlin Lewis (Treasurer)
Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2020. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
Bringing help, hope, and healing to at-risk animals and the people who love them.
What it reported doing in 2020
St. Francis Animal Protection Society is formed to (i) educate the public with respect to the proper care and humane treatment of animals, (ii) rescue, foster, provide medical care to, and promote the adoption of abandoned and surrendered animals, (iii) assist guardians, who are no longer able to care for one or more companion animals, (iv) operate and support trap, neuter/spay and release programs for feral cats, (iv) provide support to other animal rescue operations, including financial support to assist with the cost of medical care for companion animals, and (vii) engage in such other activities as are furtherance of the above purposes or otherwise promote the health and well being of companion animals.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Cannot be determined from the filing. The filing does not provide enough consistent revenue detail to tell how this nonprofit funds its work.
- Distribution model
- Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
The verdict
STRONG - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Program spending has declined or grown slowly and revenue has declined or grown slowly.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 92
- Transparency & Controls: 82
- Sustainability: 35
- Growth: 0
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 89.9%; rating input score 90
- Program expense ratio: 95.7%; rating input score 96
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 51st percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Limited
Sustainability
- Operating margin: 6%; rating input score 54; 54th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.12; rating input score 9; 9th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: Limited
- Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 56; 56th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: -3.5% per year; rating input score 0; 52nd percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: -3.6% per year; rating input score 0; 52nd percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: -25.9% per year; rating input score 0; 7th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 89.9% of revenue deployed · 95.7% of spending went to programs
- Governance: Filed governance answers
- Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment · $76K in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 3 people listed
- Consistency: 6 of 6 current checks pass
- Schedules: 2 filed schedules
- Filing history: 6 filing years from 2013 to 2020
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
Grant-readiness screening is separate from the live rating, not a measure of program quality. Review the source records before making a grant decision.
- High — Growth: Program expense growth scored 0/100.
- High — Growth: Revenue growth scored 0/100.
- High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 9/100.
- Review — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 54/100.
- High — Growth: Asset growth scored 0/100.
- Review — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 56/100.
- High — Grant Readiness: Automatic revocation: this organization had its federal tax-exempt status automatically revoked.
- High — Grant Readiness: California registration: this organization is not authorized to operate as a charity in California.