St Elizabeth Health Center School for Nurse Anesthetists Inc
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 341840231
- IRS 990 coverage
- 2010–2024
- Forms available
- Form 990 2024
- Location
- Canfield, OH, USA
- Phone
- 3302865330
- Rating
- 70
- Verdict
- SUPPORTED
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Education N.E.C.
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $945,304
- Expenses
- $863,192
- Assets
- $83,908
- Liabilities
- $105,023
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
10 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- STEVEN L SHEAKOSKI MD (PRESIDENT /MEDICAL DIRECTO)
Highest reported compensation
- JOHN UNDERWOOD (PROGRAM DIRECTOR): $247,653 total reported compensation
- DOUGLAS SHAFFER (CLINICAL COORDINATOR): $226,625 total reported compensation
- STEVEN L SHEAKOSKI MD (PRESIDENT /MEDICAL DIRECTO): $4,781 total reported compensation
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
St. Elizabeth health center school for nurse anesthetists, inc. Is an alliance of anesthesia practitioners who intend to motivate and empower students to education through teaching, mentoring, and collaborating in an environment of personal interest and caring. The school community develops in students a sense of self-worth and future opportunity that compels them to make a positive impact on our society. The school shares common goals with mercy health and youngstown state university by striving to promote an environment that encourages academic excellence and quality of service for all members of our community. The core values of reverence, commitment, justice, stewardship, and integrity are enhanced by this alignment between the facilities. The combined philosophies have enriched the holistic practice of nurse anesthesia. The department of nursing supports the missions of youngstown state university and the bitonte college of health and human services. The department of nursing prov
What it reported doing in 2024
Education activities and instruction for 57 students.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Earned-program. 100% of the money available for current operations came from fees and other program revenue.
- Distribution model
- Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
The verdict
SUPPORTED - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Few specific pay-setting methods are documented in the filing; unanswered boxes are not proof of absence and some filing-based governance responses are negative or unanswered.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 77
- Transparency & Controls: 60
- Accountability: 78
- Sustainability: 35
- Growth: 80
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 83.9%; rating input score 84
- Program expense ratio: 91.8%; rating input score 92
- Fundraising efficiency: Limited
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
- Pay-setting controls: 0 of 6 controls in place; rating input score 0
- Compensation committee: Missing
- Independent consultant: Missing
- Other Form 990s reviewed: Missing
- Written employment contract: Missing
- Compensation survey or study: Missing
- Board or committee approval: Missing
- Foreign activity oversight: Limited
- Grant itemization coverage: Limited
- Major donor itemization: Limited
- Related-party transparency: Limited
Accountability
- Independent voting board: 85.7%; rating input score 86; 20th percentile among comparable filings
- Governance controls: 6 of 9 controls in place; rating input score 67
- Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
- Whistleblower policy: Pass
- Document-retention policy: Pass
- CEO compensation review process: Pass
- Other executive compensation review process: Pass
- Form 990 shared with the board: Fail
- Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
- Audit committee oversight: Missing
- Independent financial-statement audit: Fail
Sustainability
- Operating margin: 8.7%; rating input score 59; 59th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.1; rating input score 5; 5th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 1.25; rating input score 4; 4th percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 6.3%; rating input score 49; 49th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: 11.1% per year; rating input score 100; 66th percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: 7.7% per year; rating input score 100; 57th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: -26.3% per year; rating input score 0; 1st percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 83.9% of revenue deployed · 91.8% of spending went to programs
- Governance: 6 of 7 board members independent · 6 of 9 filing controls reported
- Programs: 1 filed program accomplishment · $793K in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $248K · 10 people listed · 0 of 6 pay-setting controls reported
- Consistency: 18 of 18 current checks pass
- Schedules: 6 filed schedules · includes executive pay
- Filing history: 15 filing years from 2010 to 2024
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Related organizations: 1 filed related-organization link
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- High — Transparency & Controls: Pay-setting controls scored 0/100.
- Review — Accountability: Governance controls: 2 of 8 not reported.
- High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 5/100.
- High — Growth: Asset growth scored 0/100.
- Review — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 59/100.
- High — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 4/100.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 49/100.