St Clair Health Corporation
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 251522445
- IRS 990 coverage
- 2020–2024
- Forms available
- Form 990 2024
- Location
- Pittsburgh, PA, USA
- Phone
- 4129421250
- Rating
- 69
- Verdict
- SUPPORTED
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Community Health Systems
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $223,185
- Expenses
- $42,892
- Assets
- $21,371,742
- Liabilities
- $97,063
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
20 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- Michael J Flanagan (Pres/CEO/Asst Secy-SCHC)
Highest reported compensation
- Michael J Flanagan (Pres/CEO/Asst Secy-SCHC): $1,185,782 total reported compensation
- Barry S Zaiser (Former Officer-SCHC): $717,985 total reported compensation
- Eric Luttringer (Sr. VP/CFO/Treasurer-SCHC): $610,584 total reported compensation
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
To provide highly valued, service-oriented healthcare to the community.
What it reported doing in 2024
St. Clair Health Corporation (The Corporation), is Parent to the other corporations in the group (St. Clair Memorial Hospital(the Hospital), St. Clair Memorial Hospital Foundation(the Foundation), St. Clair Medical Services, Inc.(SCMS), St. Clair Anesthesia Associates, St. Clair Professional Services, St. Clair Physician Partners LLC, and SCNSC Properties, Inc.). St. Clair Physician Partners (SCPP) LLC is an Accountable Care Organization working with providers to improve quality and cost of health care. SCPP also has an ownership interest in a Clinically Integrated Network. St. Clair Health Corporation also has ownership interest in Bridges PHSO which supports Bridges Health Partners in transforming how healthcare services are delivered by implementing an integrated, regional network (Continued on Schedule O) of care that supports all patient populations, no matter the payer. The Parent provides overall direction and control and operates as a central location for the long range planning for the group as the corporations in the group fulfill their exempt purposes by providing healthcare services and operating a 24 hour Emergency Department to meet the needs of the community regardless of ability to pay.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Investment-supported. 83% of the money available for current operations came from recurring investment income.
- Distribution model
- Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
The verdict
SUPPORTED - The filed numbers largely add up and most voting board members are independent. A relatively small share of available resources goes toward mission work and program spending has declined or grown slowly.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 47
- Transparency & Controls: 94
- Accountability: 84
- Sustainability: 81
- Growth: 20
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 28.2%; rating input score 28
- Program expense ratio: 93.5%; rating input score 93
- Fundraising efficiency: Limited
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 90.9%; rating input score 91; 13th percentile among comparable filings
- Pay-setting controls: 6 of 6 controls in place; rating input score 100
- Compensation committee: Pass
- Independent consultant: Pass
- Other Form 990s reviewed: Pass
- Written employment contract: Pass
- Compensation survey or study: Pass
- Board or committee approval: Pass
- Foreign activity oversight: Limited
- Grant itemization coverage: Limited
- Major donor itemization: Limited
- Related-party transparency: Limited
Accountability
- Independent voting board: 73.3%; rating input score 73; 19th percentile among comparable filings
- Governance controls: 9 of 9 controls in place; rating input score 100
- Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
- Whistleblower policy: Pass
- Document-retention policy: Pass
- CEO compensation review process: Pass
- Other executive compensation review process: Pass
- Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
- Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
- Audit committee oversight: Pass
- Independent financial-statement audit: Pass
Sustainability
- Operating margin: 80.8%; rating input score 98; 98th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 498.27; rating input score 100; 100th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0; rating input score 50; 50th percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 1,459.9%; rating input score 0; 0th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: -65.2% per year; rating input score 0; 1st percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: -41.2% per year; rating input score 0; 1st percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 1.6% per year; rating input score 100; 31st percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 28.2% of revenue deployed · 93.5% of spending went to programs
- Governance: 11 of 15 board members independent · 9 of 9 filing controls reported
- Programs: 1 filed program accomplishment · $40K in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $1.2M · 20 people listed · 6 of 6 pay-setting controls reported
- Consistency: 16 of 17 current checks pass · 1 finding to review
- Schedules: 5 filed schedules · includes executive pay
- Filing history: 5 filing years from 2020 to 2024
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Related organizations: 3 filed related-organization links
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- High — Financial Efficiency: Mission deployment rate scored 28/100.
- High — Growth: Program expense growth scored 0/100.
- High — Growth: Revenue growth scored 0/100.
- Review — Transparency & Controls: Schedule R controlled transactions itemized did not reconcile in the filed values.
- High — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 0/100.
- Review — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 50/100.