St Clair Association of Realtors

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
631131697
IRS 990-EZ coverage
2017–2025
Forms available
Form 990 2015, Form 990-EZ 2025
Location
Pell City, AL, USA
Phone
2053387729
Rating
42
Verdict
MIXED
Rating confidence
Moderate
Sector
Real Estate Associations

Reported finances

Revenue
$60,562
Expenses
$60,797
Assets
$40,239
Liabilities
$1,225

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

16 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • KATRINA HENNINGS (PRESIDENT)
  • WES HARRELL (PRESIDENT EL)

People named in this filing

  • KATRINA HENNINGS (PRESIDENT)
  • WES HARRELL (PRESIDENT EL)
  • DAWN WILLIAMS (SECRETARY/TR)

Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

To unite those engaged in the recognized branches of the real estate profession in this community for the purpose of exerting a beneficial influence upon the profession and related interests; to promote and maintain high standards of conduct in the real estate profession as expressed in the code of ethics of the national association of realtors; to provide a unified medium for real estate owners and those engaged in the real estate profession whereby their interests may be safeguarded and advanced; to further the interest of home and other real property ownership; to unite those engaged in the real estate profession in this community with the Alabama association of realtors, inc., and the national association of realtors, thereby furthering their own objectives throughout the state and nation, and obtaining the benefits and privileges of membership therein; and to designate, for the benefit of the public, those individuals within its jurisdiction authorized to use the terms "realtor" a

What it reported doing in 2025

To unite those engaged in the recognized branches of the real estate profession in this community for the purpose of exerting a beneficial influence upon the profession and related interests; to promote and maintain high standards of conduct in the real estate profession as expressed in the code of ethics of the national association of realtors; to provide a unified medium for real estate owners and those engaged in the real estate profession whereby their interests may be safeguarded and advanced; to further the interest of home and other real property ownership; to unite those engaged in the real estate profession in this community with the Alabama association of realtors, inc., and the national association of realtors, thereby furthering their own objectives throughout the state and nation, and obtaining the benefits and privileges of membership therein; and to designate, for the benefit of the public, those individuals within its jurisdiction authorized to use the terms "realtor- and "realtor- associates", as licensed, prescribed and controlled by the national association of realtors.

Operating model

Revenue model
Mixed. Its operating money came from several sources; no one source provided a clear majority.
Distribution model
Transfer-based 990-EZ. The 990-EZ reports grants or member benefits, but it does not separate enough spending to show the nonprofit’s full delivery mix.

The verdict

MIXED - The filed numbers largely add up and revenue has grown recently. A relatively small share of available resources goes toward mission work and expenses are high relative to revenue.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 9
  • Transparency & Controls: 82
  • Sustainability: 33
  • Growth: 60

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 14.2%; rating input score 14
  • Program expense ratio: Limited

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 51st percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Limited

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: -0.4%; rating input score 41; 41st percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.66; rating input score 37; 37th percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.03; rating input score 20; 20th percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 18.5%; rating input score 8; 8th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: Limited
  • Revenue growth: 1.6% per year; rating input score 100; 56th percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: 3.6% per year; rating input score 100; 51st percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 14.2% of revenue deployed
  • Governance: Filed governance answers
  • Accomplishments: 2 filed program accomplishments
  • Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 16 people listed
  • Consistency: 6 of 6 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 1 filed schedules
  • Filing history: 9 filing years from 2017 to 2025
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Money network: 1 filed money-flow record
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • High — Financial Efficiency: Mission deployment rate scored 14/100.
  • Moderate — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 41/100.
  • Moderate — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 37/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 8/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 20/100.