Besremi

Legal name: St Charles Mercy Hospital of Oregon Ohio

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
344445373
IRS 990 coverage
2010–2013
Official website data refreshed
Sep 2026
Forms available
Form 990 2013
Location
Oregon, OH, USA
Phone
4196967200
Rating
73
Verdict
SUPPORTED
Rating confidence
Moderate
Affiliation
Christianity

Official website

Reported finances

Revenue
$130,766,445
Expenses
$123,479,022
Assets
$0
Liabilities
$0

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2013. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

48 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • ANDREA PRICE (PRESIDENT & CEO, MHP-NORTHERN MARKET)
  • JACALYN LIEBOWITZ (SVP Nursing, Interim CEO St Charles Hospital)
  • ROBERT GOSPODAREK (PRESIDENT & CEO, ST CHARLES MERCY HOSPITAL)
  • JEFFREY DEMPSEY (VICE PRESIDENT OF OPERATIONS)
  • JUDITH ZBIERAJEWSKI (VICE PRESIDENT - PATIENT CARE & CNO)
  • KEVIN COOK (PRESIDENT & CEO, MSVMC & METRO HOSPITALS)

Highest reported compensation

  • STEVEN L MICKUS (FORMER OFFICER): $2,882,500 total reported compensation
  • BRIAN SMITH (TRUSTEE, CHP EVP NETWORKS): $939,513 total reported compensation
  • SAMANTHA PLATZKE (FORMER OFFICER): $636,072 total reported compensation

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2013. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

We serve together in the spirit of the Gospel as a compassionate and transforming healing presence within our communities.

What it reported doing in 2013

The primary exempt purpose of st. Charles mercy hospital is to extend the healing ministry of jesus by improving the health of our communities with emphasis on people who are poor and under-served. St. Charles mercy hospital accomplishes this purpose by demonstrating behaviors reflecting our core values of compassion, excellence, human dignity, justice, sacredness of life and service. Total charity care provided was $4,286,766 serving 11,560 individuals.

Operating model

Revenue model
Other-operating. 99% of the money available for current operations came from other operating revenue.
Distribution model
Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.

The verdict

SUPPORTED - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Revenue has declined or grown slowly and assets have declined or grown slowly.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 77
  • Transparency & Controls: 81
  • Accountability: 81
  • Sustainability: 34
  • Growth: 0

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 86%; rating input score 86
  • Program expense ratio: 87.3%; rating input score 87
  • Fundraising efficiency: Limited

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 84.6%; rating input score 85; 0th percentile among comparable filings
  • Pay-setting controls: 4 of 6 controls in place; rating input score 67
    • Compensation committee: Pass
    • Independent consultant: Pass
    • Other Form 990s reviewed: Missing
    • Written employment contract: Missing
    • Compensation survey or study: Pass
    • Board or committee approval: Pass
  • Foreign activity oversight: Limited
  • Grant itemization coverage: Limited
  • Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
  • Related-party transparency: Limited

Accountability

  • Independent voting board: 66.7%; rating input score 67; 21st percentile among comparable filings
  • Governance controls: 9 of 9 controls in place; rating input score 100
    • Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
    • Whistleblower policy: Pass
    • Document-retention policy: Pass
    • CEO compensation review process: Pass
    • Other executive compensation review process: Pass
    • Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
    • Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
    • Audit committee oversight: Pass
    • Independent financial-statement audit: Pass

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: 5.6%; rating input score 60; 60th percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 0; rating input score 0; 0th percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: Limited
  • Officer compensation ratio: 2.3%; rating input score 45; 45th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: Limited
  • Revenue growth: -6.1% per year; rating input score 0; 4th percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: -40.5% per year; rating input score 0; 1st percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • What they do: Mission, programs, and operating context captured from the official website.
  • Where the money goes: 86% of revenue deployed · 87.3% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: 12 of 18 board members independent · 9 of 9 filing controls reported
  • Programs: 1 filed program accomplishment · $107.8M in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $2.9M · 48 people listed · 4 of 6 pay-setting controls reported
  • Consistency: 23 of 23 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 9 filed schedules · includes major donors and executive pay
  • Filing history: 4 filing years from 2010 to 2013
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Money network: 10 filed money-flow records
  • Related organizations: 102 filed related-organization links
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • High — Growth: Revenue growth scored 0/100.
  • High — Growth: Asset growth scored 0/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 0/100.
  • Moderate — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 45/100.