St Charles City County Library Foundation
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 431860793
- IRS 990 coverage
- 2013–2024
- Forms available
- Form 990 2024
- Location
- Saint Peters, MO, USA
- Phone
- 6362443947
- Rating
- 83
- Verdict
- STRONG
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Single Organization Support
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $171,715
- Expenses
- $142,371
- Assets
- $1,100,656
- Liabilities
- $4,920
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
15 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- MARTHA MAZZOLA (PRESIDENT)
Highest reported compensation
- JENNIFER COMPTON-LINDEN (LIBRARY FOUNDATION DIRECTO): $86,590 total reported compensation
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
We raise funds beyond tax dollar support to build a stronger library in service to our community.
What it reported doing in 2024
The born to read program provides new parents at participating hospitals in st. Charles county with a bag containing a book, early literacy information, and a library card application with information about the library. Research shows that reading books with a child beginning in early infancy can boost vocabulary and reading skills four years later, before the start of elementary school.the storybook walk provides a new outdoor adventure that champions family connection, early childhood development, and health and wellness. Stories are hand-picked by library staff with a child's enjoyment in mind and are changed out every month. Pages are posted at several stations along a trail, allowing families and friends to enjoy a story as they walk the path and take in the scenery.the foundation funded the excel adult online high school diploma program, providing resources for curriculum access, instructional support, and related educational materials to help adults complete their high school education.early literacy centers are designated areas within library branches that provide resources and activities to support the development of early literacy skills in children from birth through age five. These spaces include age-appropriate books, educational materials, and interactive learning tools designed to foster language, cognitive, and motor skill development, as well as parent and caregiver engagement in early learning.ipad refresh : the foundation purchased 40 replacement ipads for use in early literacy areas within branch libraries and in two ipad labs. These updated devices replaced obsolete equipment and are used to support early learning, literacy development, and educational programming for children and families.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Donor-supported. 84% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
- Distribution model
- Grant intermediary. The nonprofit sent 98% of its reported program spending out as grants.
The verdict
STRONG - The filed numbers largely add up and a large share of available resources goes toward mission work. Some filing-based governance responses are negative or unanswered and reported officer compensation is a large share of total spending, which may reflect staffing concentration.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 68
- Transparency & Controls: 94
- Accountability: 95
- Sustainability: 67
- Growth: 100
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 65.8%; rating input score 66
- Program expense ratio: 69.3%; rating input score 69
- Fundraising efficiency: $39.29 raised per $1 spent on fundraising; rating input score 72; 72nd percentile among comparable filings
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 64th percentile among comparable filings
- Pay-setting controls: Limited
- Foreign activity oversight: Limited
- Grant itemization coverage: 100%; rating input score 100; 80th percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
- Related-party transparency: Limited
Accountability
- Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
- Governance controls: 7 of 8 controls in place; rating input score 88
- Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
- Whistleblower policy: Pass
- Document-retention policy: Pass
- CEO compensation review process: NotApplicable
- Other executive compensation review process: Fail
- Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
- Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
- Audit committee oversight: Pass
- Independent financial-statement audit: Pass
Sustainability
- Operating margin: 17.1%; rating input score 70; 70th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 7.73; rating input score 86; 86th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0; rating input score 50; 50th percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 12.7%; rating input score 26; 26th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: 2.7% per year; rating input score 100; 43rd percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: 2% per year; rating input score 100; 35th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 3.1% per year; rating input score 100; 39th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 65.8% of revenue deployed · 69.3% of spending went to programs
- Governance: 14 of 14 board members independent · 7 of 8 filing controls reported
- Programs: 1 filed program accomplishment · $99K in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $87K · 15 people listed
- Consistency: 24 of 24 current checks pass
- Schedules: 7 filed schedules · includes major donors and grants
- Filing history: 12 filing years from 2013 to 2024
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: 1 filed money-flow record
- Related organizations: 2 filed related-organization links
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- Review — Accountability: Governance controls: Other executive compensation review process not reported.
- High — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 26/100.
- Review — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 50/100.