St Catherine's Center for Children
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 141338455
- IRS 990 coverage
- 2010–2024
- Forms available
- Form 990 2024
- Location
- Albany, NY, USA
- Phone
- 5184536700
- Rating
- 85
- Verdict
- STRONG
- Rating confidence
- Standard
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $22,465,511
- Expenses
- $22,663,607
- Assets
- $13,071,455
- Liabilities
- $8,491,873
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
19 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- AMY KRAMER (PRESIDENT)
- DONALD A ROBBINS (VICE PRESIDENT)
- CINDY KOUHOUT (FORMER EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR)
- JESSICA LUQUIS (ASSOCIATE EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR OF CLINICAL SERVICES)
Highest reported compensation
- JORDAN ROSSETTINI (NURSE PRACTITIONER, PSYCHI): $202,492 total reported compensation
- CINDY KOUHOUT (FORMER EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR): $168,371 total reported compensation
- JESSICA LUQUIS (ASSOCIATE EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR OF CLINICAL SERVICES): $132,382 total reported compensation
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
St. Catherine's center for children provides a comprehensive range of human services designed to offer hope, foster growth, and improve the lives of the children and families we serve.
What it reported doing in 2024
St. Catherine's offers comprehensive homeless and housing services for populations struggling with challenges related to homelessness, including but not limited to poverty, food insecurity, lack of access to health care, substance dependence, and behavioral or mental health problems. The marillac shelter provides for emergency shelter and support services for families. Project host, us hud, pathways to health programs connects individuals or families to stable housing, health care services, counseling, and employment services. Michael's house provides new affordable, supportive housing with an array of wrap around services for individuals or families. Various housing and homeless services reach people in albany, rensselaer, columbia, and schenectady counties.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Other-operating. 95% of the money available for current operations came from other operating revenue.
- Distribution model
- Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
The verdict
STRONG - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Expenses are high relative to revenue and total assets are small relative to annual expenses; liquid coverage is unknown.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 86
- Transparency & Controls: 82
- Accountability: 100
- Sustainability: 28
- Growth: 100
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 87.4%; rating input score 87
- Program expense ratio: 86.5%; rating input score 87
- Fundraising efficiency: $58.08 raised per $1 spent on fundraising; rating input score 78; 78th percentile among comparable filings
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 93.3%; rating input score 93; 14th percentile among comparable filings
- Pay-setting controls: 3 of 6 controls in place; rating input score 50
- Compensation committee: Missing
- Independent consultant: Missing
- Other Form 990s reviewed: Pass
- Written employment contract: Missing
- Compensation survey or study: Pass
- Board or committee approval: Pass
- Foreign activity oversight: Limited
- Grant itemization coverage: Limited
- Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
- Related-party transparency: Yes; rating input score 100
Accountability
- Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 66th percentile among comparable filings
- Governance controls: 9 of 9 controls in place; rating input score 100
- Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
- Whistleblower policy: Pass
- Document-retention policy: Pass
- CEO compensation review process: Pass
- Other executive compensation review process: Pass
- Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
- Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
- Audit committee oversight: Pass
- Independent financial-statement audit: Pass
Sustainability
- Operating margin: -0.9%; rating input score 27; 27th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.58; rating input score 19; 19th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.65; rating input score 20; 20th percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 3.4%; rating input score 65; 65th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: 7.3% per year; rating input score 100; 57th percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: 6.9% per year; rating input score 100; 59th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 10.3% per year; rating input score 100; 66th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 87.4% of revenue deployed · 86.5% of spending went to programs
- Governance: 13 of 13 board members independent · 9 of 9 filing controls reported
- Programs: 4 filed program accomplishments · $19.6M in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $202K · 19 people listed · 3 of 6 pay-setting controls reported
- Highest-paid contractors: 3 contractors listed · $665K reported
- Consistency: 26 of 27 current checks pass · 1 finding to review
- Schedules: 6 filed schedules · includes major donors, executive pay, and related organizations
- Filing history: 15 filing years from 2010 to 2024
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: 6 filed money-flow records
- Related organizations: 1 filed related-organization link
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- High — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 27/100.
- High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 19/100.
- Moderate — Transparency & Controls: Schedule A contributions reconciliation did not reconcile in the filed values.
- High — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 20/100.