St Bartholomew's Conservancy Inc
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 137003745
- IRS 990 coverage
- 2012–2024
- Forms available
- Form 990 2024
- Location
- New York, NY, USA
- Phone
- 2127109694
- Rating
- 79
- Verdict
- SUPPORTED
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Natural Resources Conservation and Protection
- Affiliation
- Christianity
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $611,328
- Expenses
- $276,811
- Assets
- $5,535,297
- Liabilities
- $17,750
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
17 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- WALTER SEDOVIC (PRESIDENT)
- CONSTANCE V EVANS (EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR)
Highest reported compensation
- CONSTANCE V EVANS (EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR): $127,870 total reported compensation
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
To restore and preserve the historic character and architectural significance of the landmark st. Bartholomew's site (church, community house and gardens) in the city of New York. Its mission is to raise funds necessary to help restore, preserve and maintain the building exteriors and gardens of the st. Bartholomew's site as a gift to the city and to the nation, and in so doing, to broaden public awareness of the importance of historic preservation in the urban environment.
What it reported doing in 2024
Dedicated to helping restore and preserve the exterior and gardens of the st. Bartholomew's site, a New York city landmark since 1967 and a national historic landmark since 2016, the conservancy has helped make it possible to accelerate the site's restoration by helping to defray some of the expense of repairing roofs and roof drains, terraces, the church building's north facade, and the great dome to which the conservancy contributed $1.8 million to its restoration. The conservancy also funded illumination of the great dome. The focus continues on the park avenue west facade with the remarkable triple portal designed in 1901 by stanford white of mckim, mead, and white as a memorial to cornelius vanderbilt ii. The bronze doors and friezes are extraordinary works of art designed and executed by leading sculptors of their day: philip martiny, herbert adams, and andrew o'connor, with advice and supervision by daniel chester french. In 1918 the portal was moved section by section from the congregation's previous madison avenue location and provided the defining condition for bertram goodhue's overall romanesque design of the new church building.in 2024 the conservancy continued the work on the conservation evaluation of the triple portal and related entryway of st. Bartholomew's church. Investigations ranged from scientific analysis of materials the organization of the triple portal's architectural features, negative effects of pollution on the portal over the years, the casting of the bronze doors, and the early (unsuccessful) repairs made on the cipollino marble columns. This work culminated in a comprehensive conservation evaluation summary report submitted by excelsior art services with recommended treatments for conservation and preservation. These treatments will be tested by the project's lead conservator to determine the best approaches.a national search for the lead conservator for triple portal conservation was successfully undertaken in 2024. Following a national request for qualifications, st. Bartholomew's conservancy and st. Bartholomew's church jointly selected amanda trienens as the triple portal conservation project's lead conservator. Ms. Trienens, founding principal of cultural heritage conservation llc (chc), has more than 20 years of field experience working on historic structures, monuments, and sculptures. The firm's overarching goal is to ensure the longevity of our shared cultural heritage while attending to the needs of expectations of a spectrum of clients. Philosophically, chc projects are known for embracing (i) maximum retention of original materials, (ii) (recommending repairs whose durability derives from being mechanically compatible with those materials; (iii) specifying conservation treatments that are both effective and minimally invasive, and (iv) drawing attention to the public significance of heritage conservation projects. While offering a full array of design development and testing services, the firm is also uniquely equipped to manage conservation implementation.the conservancy also provided funding in 2024 totaling $23,037 for outside services for the capital project to preserve / conserve the triple portal of st. Bartholomew's church. This included triple portal sample analysis, graphic design services, legal advice for triple portal agreement, 3d imaging renders of bronze doors, photo usage fees, triple portal conservator's report printing and mailing, and continued production on the triple portal film - a masterpiece hiding in plain sight: the stanford white triple portal of st. Bartholomew's church.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Donor-supported. 63% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
- Distribution model
- Direct operator. The filing allocates 87% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
The verdict
SUPPORTED - The filed numbers largely add up and most voting board members are independent. A relatively small share of available resources goes toward mission work and fundraising costs are high for each dollar raised.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 55
- Transparency & Controls: 94
- Accountability: 100
- Sustainability: 81
- Growth: 100
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 48.5%; rating input score 49
- Program expense ratio: 65.9%; rating input score 66
- Fundraising efficiency: $16.69 raised per $1 spent on fundraising; rating input score 54; 54th percentile among comparable filings
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
- Pay-setting controls: Limited
- Foreign activity oversight: Limited
- Grant itemization coverage: 100%; rating input score 100; 76th percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
- Related-party transparency: Limited
Accountability
- Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
- Governance controls: 8 of 8 controls in place; rating input score 100
- Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
- Whistleblower policy: Pass
- Document-retention policy: Pass
- CEO compensation review process: Pass
- Other executive compensation review process: NotApplicable
- Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
- Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
- Audit committee oversight: Pass
- Independent financial-statement audit: Pass
Sustainability
- Operating margin: 54.7%; rating input score 93; 93rd percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 20; rating input score 96; 96th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0; rating input score 76; 76th percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 46.2%; rating input score 2; 2nd percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: 2.9% per year; rating input score 100; 31st percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: 6.6% per year; rating input score 100; 53rd percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 14.6% per year; rating input score 100; 71st percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 48.5% of revenue deployed · 65.9% of spending went to programs
- Governance: 15 of 15 board members independent · 8 of 8 filing controls reported
- Programs: 1 filed program accomplishment · $182K in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $128K · 17 people listed
- Consistency: 28 of 28 current checks pass
- Schedules: 5 filed schedules · includes major donors and grants
- Filing history: 12 filing years from 2012 to 2024
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: 2 filed money-flow records
- Related organizations: 1 filed related-organization link
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
- Staff and benefit plans: Retirement and health plans the organization files with the Department of Labor, and the people in them.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- Moderate — Financial Efficiency: Mission deployment rate scored 49/100.
- Review — Financial Efficiency: Fundraising efficiency scored 54/100.
- High — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 2/100.