St Baldrick's Foundation Inc
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 201173824
- IRS 990 coverage
- 2013–2024
- Forms available
- Form 990 2024
- Location
- Monrovia, CA, USA
- Phone
- 6267392700
- Rating
- 70
- Verdict
- SUPPORTED
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Public Foundations
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $23,905,649
- Expenses
- $24,544,811
- Assets
- $29,702,243
- Liabilities
- $18,378,567
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
24 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- KATHLEEN RUDDY (CEO)
Highest reported compensation
- KATHLEEN RUDDY (CEO): $291,528 total reported compensation
- JENNIFER MCCABE (CFO): $239,142 total reported compensation
- REBECCA WEAVER (CMO/SEC): $234,441 total reported compensation
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
The st. Baldrick's foundation is a volunteer and donor powered charity committed to supporting the most promising research to fund cures for childhood cancers and give survivors long and healthy lives.
What it reported doing in 2024
The st. Baldrick's foundation is the largest non-government funder of childhood cancer research grants in the u.s. These grants support every stage of research, from new discoveries to clinical trials, as well as the training of the next generation of pediatric oncology researchers. The foundation also advocates for more effective policies and increased federal funding for childhood cancer research. (continued on schedule o.)the foundation makes disease-specific grants as well as grants aimed at multiple childhood cancers. In fy 2025, grants included the following categories: research grants -- 2-year hypothesis-driven research projects. Strategic research partnership grants awards -- large 3-year grants chosen via scientific review of applications solicited specifically for disease-specific research funded by donors and charity partners.fellowships -- early career researchers completing their pediatric oncology research training.scholars -- young investigator awards to enable early career scientists to continue research. International scholars -- training for researchers from low- and middle-income countries, to then return and conduct research in their home country. Infrastructure grants -- support to open and conduct more clinical trials, to give children access to life-saving treatments closer to home.children's oncology group -- support disbursed to more than 200 institutions across north america and beyond, for the treatment of children on cog clinical trials.st. Baldrick's epicc team (empowering pediatric immunotherapies for childhood cancers) -- research to develop new immunotherapies for multiple childhood cancer types.international beneficiaries -- support for research in other countries where st. Baldrick's fundraising events are held.the foundation also plays a leading role in working with others to advance more effective policies and increased federal funding for childhood cancer research. We work with coalitions of other nonprofits supportive of childhood cancer and jointly trained volunteer advocates to educate elected officials, legislative staff, and federal agencies as to the needs of children with cancer and the work of the researchers endeavoring to save them. The foundation is working with our partners to secure passage of the mikaela naylon give kids a chance act which will extend vital research incentives, ensure children with cancer continue to have access to the newest cures, and guarantee pediatric studies happen in a timely manner, and the accelerating kids' access to care act which will reduce red tape delays, allowing children with cancer and other complex medical needs who are covered by medicaid quicker access to time-sensitive care.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Donor-supported. 97% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
- Distribution model
- Grant intermediary. The nonprofit sent 90% of its reported program spending out as grants.
- Includes noncash contributions: Reported contributions include donated property or goods.
The verdict
SUPPORTED - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. The filing reports few safeguards for money sent abroad and fundraising costs are high for each dollar raised.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 66
- Transparency & Controls: 76
- Accountability: 96
- Sustainability: 30
- Growth: 0
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 73.2%; rating input score 73
- Program expense ratio: 70.4%; rating input score 70
- Fundraising efficiency: $4.22 raised per $1 spent on fundraising; rating input score 17; 17th percentile among comparable filings
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 94.1%; rating input score 94; 20th percentile among comparable filings
- Pay-setting controls: 5 of 6 controls in place; rating input score 83
- Compensation committee: Pass
- Independent consultant: Missing
- Other Form 990s reviewed: Pass
- Written employment contract: Pass
- Compensation survey or study: Pass
- Board or committee approval: Pass
- Foreign activity oversight: 1 of 8 controls in place; rating input score 12
- Claims monitoring procedures: Pass
- Requires narrative reports: Fail
- Conducts field audits: Fail
- May suspend future funding: Fail
- Requires financial reports: Fail
- Conducts site visits: Fail
- Requires grant agreements: Fail
- May require repayment: Fail
- Grant itemization coverage: 100%; rating input score 100; 72nd percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
- Related-party transparency: Limited
Accountability
- Independent voting board: 93.8%; rating input score 94; 27th percentile among comparable filings
- Governance controls: 9 of 9 controls in place; rating input score 100
- Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
- Whistleblower policy: Pass
- Document-retention policy: Pass
- CEO compensation review process: Pass
- Other executive compensation review process: Pass
- Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
- Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
- Audit committee oversight: Pass
- Independent financial-statement audit: Pass
Sustainability
- Operating margin: -2.7%; rating input score 22; 22nd percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 1.21; rating input score 43; 43rd percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.62; rating input score 21; 21st percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 6.1%; rating input score 42; 42nd percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: -6.9% per year; rating input score 0; 3rd percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: -5.9% per year; rating input score 0; 2nd percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: -7.5% per year; rating input score 0; 2nd percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 73.2% of revenue deployed · 70.4% of spending went to programs
- Governance: 15 of 16 board members independent · 9 of 9 filing controls reported
- Programs: 1 filed program accomplishment · $17.3M in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $292K · 24 people listed · 5 of 6 pay-setting controls reported
- Highest-paid contractors: 3 contractors listed · $2.4M reported
- Consistency: 40 of 41 current checks pass · 1 finding to review
- Schedules: 9 filed schedules · includes major donors, foreign activity, grants, and executive pay
- Filing history: 12 filing years from 2013 to 2024
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: 64 filed money-flow records
- Related organizations: 55 filed related-organization links
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
- Staff and benefit plans: Retirement and health plans the organization files with the Department of Labor, and the people in them.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- High — Transparency & Controls: Foreign activity oversight: 7 of 8 not reported.
- High — Financial Efficiency: Fundraising efficiency scored 17/100.
- High — Growth: Program expense growth scored 0/100.
- High — Growth: Revenue growth scored 0/100.
- High — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 22/100.
- High — Growth: Asset growth scored 0/100.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 43/100.
- High — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 21/100.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 42/100.
- Review — Transparency & Controls: Domestic grant itemization did not reconcile in the filed values.