St Augustine Home Guild Inc

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
851742032
IRS 990-EZ coverage
2020–2024
Forms available
Form 990-EZ 2024
Location
Indianapolis, IN, USA
Phone
3178481552
Rating
96
Verdict
STRONG
Rating confidence
Moderate

Reported finances

Revenue
$100,178
Expenses
$99,702
Assets
$12,177

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

7 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • Mary Patout (President)

People named in this filing

  • Elisabeth Groot (First Vice Pres)
  • Lucinda Blackwell (Second Vice Pre)
  • Virlee Weaver (Secretary)

Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

St. Augustine Home Guild, Inc.'s purpose is to aid The Little Sisters of the Poor of Indianapolis, Inc., an Indiana not-for-profit corporation qualifying as an exempt organization under Section 501(c)(3) of the Internal Revenue Code, in the operation of the St. Augustine Home in Indianapolis, Indiana by providing volunteer assistance within the functional areas of the St. Augustine Home, sponsoring activities and events for the the residents of the St. Augustine Home and conducting fundraising events with the proceeds going solely to The Little Sisters of the Poor of Indianapolis, Inc. at the St. Augustine Home.

Operating model

Revenue model
Cannot be determined from the filing. The filing does not provide enough consistent revenue detail to tell how this nonprofit funds its work.
Distribution model
Cannot be determined from the filing. The filing does not provide enough consistent spending detail to tell whether the nonprofit works directly or through others.

The verdict

STRONG - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Some filed totals do not add up and expenses are high relative to revenue.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 100
  • Transparency & Controls: 100
  • Sustainability: 28
  • Growth: 100

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 100%; rating input score 100
  • Program expense ratio: 100%; rating input score 100

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 52nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: 0.5%; rating input score 35; 35th percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.12; rating input score 13; 13th percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: Limited
  • Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 63; 63rd percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: 37.6% per year; rating input score 100; 88th percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: 31.9% per year; rating input score 100; 91st percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: 12% per year; rating input score 100; 66th percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 100% of revenue deployed · 100% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: Filed governance answers
  • Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment · $111K in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 7 people listed
  • Consistency: 6 of 7 current checks pass · 1 finding to review
  • Schedules: 4 filed schedules
  • Filing history: 4 filing years from 2020 to 2024
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Money network: Resolved incoming and outgoing counterparties from filed money flows.
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • Moderate — Transparency & Controls: Part III program expenses within total did not reconcile in the filed values.
  • Moderate — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 35/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 13/100.