St Andrews By-the-sea Foundation
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 953415396
- IRS 990 coverage
- 2017–2025
- Forms available
- Form 990 2025
- Location
- San Clemente, CA, USA
- Phone
- 9494922537
- Rating
- 52
- Verdict
- MIXED
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Public Foundations
- Affiliation
- Christianity
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $227,625
- Expenses
- $47,672
- Assets
- $1,024,994
- Liabilities
- $0
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
14 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- JIM WILSON (Vice President)
- STEVE PETTY (President)
People named in this filing
- BEV SANDELMAN (BOARD MEMBER)
- JIM WILSON (Vice President)
- LINDA WILLIAMS (Treasurer)
Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
Support st. Andrews by-the-sea church's mission/outreach program
What it reported doing in 2025
St. Andrews by-the-Sea Memorial Garden for the final placement of the remains of loved ones and memorials
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Mixed. Its operating money came from several sources; no one source provided a clear majority.
- Distribution model
- Hybrid. The nonprofit split its reported program spending across 42% for direct work, and 58% for grants.
The verdict
MIXED - The filed numbers largely add up and revenue comfortably covers expenses. A relatively small share of available resources goes toward mission work and a relatively small share of voting board members are independent.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 29
- Transparency & Controls: 93
- Accountability: 24
- Sustainability: 91
- Growth: 60
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 8.9%; rating input score 9
- Program expense ratio: 65.8%; rating input score 66
- Fundraising efficiency: $4.43 raised per $1 spent on fundraising; rating input score 19; 19th percentile among comparable filings
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 64th percentile among comparable filings
- Pay-setting controls: Limited
- Foreign activity oversight: Limited
- Grant itemization coverage: 100%; rating input score 100; 81st percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Limited
- Related-party transparency: Limited
Accountability
- Independent voting board: 0%; rating input score 0; 8th percentile among comparable filings
- Governance controls: 4 of 7 controls in place; rating input score 57
- Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
- Whistleblower policy: Fail
- Document-retention policy: Pass
- CEO compensation review process: NotApplicable
- Other executive compensation review process: NotApplicable
- Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
- Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
- Audit committee oversight: Missing
- Independent financial-statement audit: Fail
Sustainability
- Operating margin: 79.1%; rating input score 97; 97th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 21.5; rating input score 96; 96th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0; rating input score 77; 77th percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 67; 67th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: -3.7% per year; rating input score 0; 18th percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: 7% per year; rating input score 100; 57th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 7.1% per year; rating input score 100; 53rd percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 8.9% of revenue deployed · 65.8% of spending went to programs
- Governance: 0 of 14 board members independent · 4 of 7 filing controls reported
- Programs: 2 filed program accomplishments · $31K in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 14 people listed
- Consistency: 14 of 14 current checks pass
- Schedules: 3 filed schedules · includes grants
- Filing history: 9 filing years from 2017 to 2025
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: 1 filed money-flow record
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
Grant-readiness screening is separate from the live rating, not a measure of program quality. Review the source records before making a grant decision.
- High — Financial Efficiency: Mission deployment rate scored 9/100.
- High — Accountability: Independent voting board scored 0/100.
- High — Financial Efficiency: Fundraising efficiency scored 19/100.
- Review — Accountability: Governance controls: 2 of 6 not reported.
- High — Growth: Program expense growth scored 0/100.
- High — Grant Readiness: Automatic revocation: this organization had its federal tax-exempt status automatically revoked.