St Andrew Technical High School Alumni Assoc

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
201988721
IRS 990-EZ coverage
2010–2024
Forms available
Form 990-EZ 2024
Location
Laurelton, NY, USA
Phone
7189490231
Rating
81
Verdict
STRONG
Rating confidence
Moderate
Sector
Fund Raising and/or Fund Distribution

Reported finances

Revenue
$38,784
Expenses
$36,700
Assets
$33,666

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

9 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • MELANIE FORREST-GEORGE (PRESIDENT)

People named in this filing

  • MELANIE FORREST-GEORGE (PRESIDENT)
  • WINSOME CUNNINGHAM (VICE PRESIDE)
  • DAYON CHAMBERS (SECRETARY)

Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

To empower future generations through unwavering support of st. Andrew technical high school. The organization is committed to fostering educational opportunities and growth by providing scholarships to deserving students, contributing to capital improvements, and responding to the evolving needs of the school community. By doing so, we aim to create a legacy of academic excellence, accessibility, and resilience, ensuring that every student has the resources needed to thrive and succeed."

What it reported doing in 2024

The organization also contributed to other aspects of school life, from cash donations supporting essential needs of the school to track and field events and programs to benfit the students. These contributions, alongside many others, reflect our ongoing commitment to nurturing a well-rounded, supportive environment where every student has the tools to excel academically, athletically, and personally.

Operating model

Revenue model
Mixed. Its operating money came from several sources; no one source provided a clear majority.
Distribution model
Grant intermediary. The nonprofit sent 94% of its reported program spending out as grants.

The verdict

STRONG - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Expenses are high relative to revenue and total assets are small relative to annual expenses; liquid coverage is unknown.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 82
  • Transparency & Controls: 82
  • Sustainability: 45
  • Growth: 100

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 79.7%; rating input score 80
  • Program expense ratio: 84.2%; rating input score 84

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 52nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Limited

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: 5.4%; rating input score 55; 55th percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.92; rating input score 44; 44th percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: Limited
  • Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 56; 56th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: 10.4% per year; rating input score 100; 72nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: 6.7% per year; rating input score 100; 75th percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: 18.5% per year; rating input score 100; 85th percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 79.7% of revenue deployed · 84.2% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: Filed governance answers
  • Accomplishments: 4 filed program accomplishments · $31K in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 9 people listed
  • Consistency: 7 of 7 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 3 filed schedules
  • Filing history: 14 filing years from 2010 to 2024
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • Review — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 55/100.
  • Moderate — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 44/100.
  • Review — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 56/100.