St Agnes Apartments Inc
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 431447602
- IRS 990 coverage
- 2010–2024
- Forms available
- Form 990 2024
- Location
- St Louis, MO, USA
- Phone
- 3149618000
- Rating
- 80
- Verdict
- STRONG
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Low-Income & Subsidized Rental Housing
- Affiliation
- Christianity
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $798,360
- Expenses
- $920,704
- Assets
- $1,981,800
- Liabilities
- $4,978,567
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
22 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- CHRIS BAECHLE (CEO/ASST SECRETARY)
- JARED BRYSON (PRESIDENT, CATHOLIC CHARITIES)
- JERRY RUMPH (BOARD PRESIDENT)
- SR RENITA BRUMMER (BOARD VICE-PRESIDENT)
Highest reported compensation
- CHRIS BAECHLE (CEO/ASST SECRETARY): $231,361 total reported compensation
- JARED BRYSON (PRESIDENT, CATHOLIC CHARITIES): $230,378 total reported compensation
- JOE JANSEN (CFO/COUNCIL MEMBER): $174,481 total reported compensation
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
To bring the healing, help, and hope of jesus christ to those in need with a compassionate, caring presence.
What it reported doing in 2024
St. Agnes apartments, inc. Provides safe, affordable housing and related facilities and services for 78 lower income senior adult tenants.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Mixed. Its operating money came from several sources; no one source provided a clear majority.
- Distribution model
- Direct operator. The filing allocates 99% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
The verdict
STRONG - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Few specific pay-setting methods are documented in the filing; unanswered boxes are not proof of absence and expenses are high relative to revenue.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 85
- Transparency & Controls: 71
- Accountability: 94
- Sustainability: 30
- Growth: 80
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 100%; rating input score 100
- Program expense ratio: 89.3%; rating input score 89
- Fundraising efficiency: Limited
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
- Pay-setting controls: 0 of 6 controls in place; rating input score 0
- Compensation committee: Missing
- Independent consultant: Missing
- Other Form 990s reviewed: Missing
- Written employment contract: Missing
- Compensation survey or study: Missing
- Board or committee approval: Missing
- Foreign activity oversight: Limited
- Grant itemization coverage: 100%; rating input score 100; 76th percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
- Related-party transparency: Limited
Accountability
- Independent voting board: 90.5%; rating input score 90; 23rd percentile among comparable filings
- Governance controls: 9 of 9 controls in place; rating input score 100
- Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
- Whistleblower policy: Pass
- Document-retention policy: Pass
- CEO compensation review process: Pass
- Other executive compensation review process: Pass
- Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
- Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
- Audit committee oversight: Pass
- Independent financial-statement audit: Pass
Sustainability
- Operating margin: -15.3%; rating input score 12; 12th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 2.15; rating input score 67; 67th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 2.51; rating input score 1; 1st percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 8.7%; rating input score 41; 41st percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: 1.6% per year; rating input score 100; 24th percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: 3% per year; rating input score 100; 31st percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: -4.5% per year; rating input score 0; 7th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 100% of revenue deployed · 89.3% of spending went to programs
- Governance: 19 of 21 board members independent · 9 of 9 filing controls reported
- Programs: 2 filed program accomplishments · $822K in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $231K · 22 people listed · 0 of 6 pay-setting controls reported
- Consistency: 30 of 30 current checks pass
- Schedules: 7 filed schedules · includes major donors, grants, and executive pay
- Filing history: 15 filing years from 2010 to 2024
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Related organizations: 5 filed related-organization links
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- High — Transparency & Controls: Pay-setting controls scored 0/100.
- High — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 12/100.
- High — Growth: Asset growth scored 0/100.
- High — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 1/100.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 41/100.