Ssp International Inc

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
943341965
IRS 990 coverage
2009–2024
Forms available
Form 990 2024
Location
Wilmington, DE, USA
Phone
8667280999
Rating
75
Verdict
SUPPORTED
Rating confidence
Moderate
Sector
Specialized Education Institutions

Official website

Reported finances

Revenue
$962,702
Expenses
$1,072,577
Assets
$203,315,662
Liabilities
$224,573

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

19 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • FRANK STESLOW (CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER)

Highest reported compensation

  • FRANK STESLOW (CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER): $345,039 total reported compensation
  • AMY GILLETTE (CHIEF ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICER): $238,346 total reported compensation
  • MICHAEL MANZELLA (VP OF ACADEMIC AFFAIRS): $121,279 total reported compensation

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

Sspi provides students with immersive, transformational opportunities to learn, do, and belong in science. We aim to ignite the passion and imagination of young minds, offering immersive and transformational opportunities that go beyond the classroom. Our goal is to create a world where science inspires and informs humanity, where every student feels the thrill of discovery and the joy of scientific exploration.

What it reported doing in 2024

Summer science program - since its inception in 1959, the summer science program has empowered high school students with rigorous stem experiences that ignite curiosity and inspire discovery. Participants engage in hands-on research projects in fields such as astrophysics, biochemistry, bacterial genomics, and synthetic chemistry guided by expert faculty and researchers. These specialists in their fields mentor students, helping them build confidence, hone their critical thinking skills, and push the boundaries of their scientific knowledge. Each program consists of 12 to 36 participants and 8 faculty members who form a diverse community of learning. The faculty includes an academic director, an associate academic director (both phd scientist-educators), a site director, and four teaching assistants and mentors. Everyone works together, immersed in the culture and values of science. For five weeks, they live and learn together on a college campus fostering analytical skills, teamwork, resilience, and creativity in a vibrant, immersive environment. Participants spend many hours each day in the classroom learning the theories and techniques underlying their research, and in the labs and observatories collecting the data they will analyze. The summer science program is intense and challenging material is presented at a pace faster than college courses. The schedule is jam-packed but every participant receives a high level of personal attention from the faculty, so no one is left behind. In summer 2024, we had 368 participants enrolled across 12 programs run at 8 universities in 7 states. For fy 2024, sspi increased our commitment to all participants by subsidizing 30% of the program's cost for everyone who attended. Additionally, over 40% of program fees were waived through our financial aid programs.

Operating model

Revenue model
Investment-supported. 83% of the money available for current operations came from recurring investment income.
Distribution model
Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.

The verdict

SUPPORTED - The filed numbers largely add up and most voting board members are independent. A relatively small share of total spending goes to programs and fundraising costs are high for each dollar raised.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 57
  • Transparency & Controls: 89
  • Accountability: 91
  • Sustainability: 46
  • Growth: 100

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 71.2%; rating input score 71
  • Program expense ratio: 52.1%; rating input score 52
  • Fundraising efficiency: $0.85 raised per $1 spent on fundraising; rating input score 3; 3rd percentile among comparable filings

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Pay-setting controls: 5 of 6 controls in place; rating input score 83
    • Compensation committee: Pass
    • Independent consultant: Pass
    • Other Form 990s reviewed: Pass
    • Written employment contract: Missing
    • Compensation survey or study: Pass
    • Board or committee approval: Pass
  • Foreign activity oversight: Limited
  • Grant itemization coverage: Limited
  • Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
  • Related-party transparency: Limited

Accountability

  • Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Governance controls: 7 of 9 controls in place; rating input score 78
    • Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
    • Whistleblower policy: Pass
    • Document-retention policy: Pass
    • CEO compensation review process: Pass
    • Other executive compensation review process: Pass
    • Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
    • Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
    • Audit committee oversight: Missing
    • Independent financial-statement audit: Fail

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: -11.4%; rating input score 15; 15th percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 189.56; rating input score 100; 100th percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 0; rating input score 79; 79th percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 65.7%; rating input score 1; 1st percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: 19% per year; rating input score 100; 81st percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: 24.6% per year; rating input score 100; 89th percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: 28.1% per year; rating input score 100; 89th percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 71.2% of revenue deployed · 52.1% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: 16 of 16 board members independent · 7 of 9 filing controls reported
  • Programs: 3 filed program accomplishments · $559K in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $345K · 19 people listed · 5 of 6 pay-setting controls reported
  • Highest-paid contractors: 2 contractors listed · $370K reported
  • Consistency: 24 of 24 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 6 filed schedules · includes major donors and executive pay
  • Filing history: 16 filing years from 2009 to 2024
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Money network: 3 filed money-flow records
  • Related organizations: Filed and resolved organization relationships.
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • Review — Financial Efficiency: Program expense ratio scored 52/100.
  • High — Financial Efficiency: Fundraising efficiency scored 3/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 15/100.
  • Review — Accountability: Governance controls: Independent financial-statement audit not reported.
  • High — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 1/100.