SRIM Center
Legal name: Srikarunamayi Research Institute of Meditation Center Inc
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 383739559
- IRS 990 coverage
- 2010–2024
- Official website data refreshed
- Sep 2026
- Forms available
- Form 990 2024, Form 990-EZ 2013
- Location
- Forsyth, GA, USA
- Phone
- 7709041919
- Rating
- 71
- Verdict
- SUPPORTED
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Hinduism
- Affiliation
- Hinduism
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $1,520,137
- Expenses
- $1,004,155
- Assets
- $3,018,071
- Liabilities
- $70,096
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
3 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- SUBHADRA VISWANADHAM (PRESIDENT)
People named in this filing
- SUBHADRA VISWANADHAM (PRESIDENT)
- LEIGH MOORE (SECRETARY)
- PRAYMA LETCHUMANAN (TREASURER)
Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
The SRIM Center is an inclusive spiritual center that hosts meditation, wellness, spiritual and world peace programs, and supports humanitarian service and research projects, while raising awareness of Amma Sri Karunamayi’s teachings. Sri Radhe Rani Gokulam Project aims at protecting Krishna’s cows in India, and creating a cure for cancer using ingredients from Brahmi cow products. Learn more and support our initiatives. Visit Gokulam Page The Srikarunamayi Research Institute of Meditation (SRIM) Center, a nonprofit, 501(c) (3) organization was inaugurated in 2006 by Her Holiness, Amma Sri Karunamayi, a global humanitarian and meditation teacher. SRIM is an inclusive spiritual center and welcomes individuals of all faiths and backgrounds. The SRIM Center’s mission is to raise awareness of Amma’s teachings and to host and conduct meditation, wellness, spiritual and world peace...
What it reported doing in 2024
Outreach services
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Donor-supported. 98% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
- Distribution model
- Grant intermediary. The nonprofit sent 65% of its reported program spending out as grants.
The verdict
SUPPORTED - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Some filing-based governance responses are negative or unanswered and some filed totals do not add up.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 70
- Transparency & Controls: 66
- Accountability: 70
- Sustainability: 79
- Growth: 100
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 66.2%; rating input score 66
- Program expense ratio: 99.4%; rating input score 99
- Fundraising efficiency: Limited
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 84.6%; rating input score 85; 2nd percentile among comparable filings
- Pay-setting controls: Limited
- Foreign activity oversight: 1 of 8 controls in place; rating input score 12
- Claims monitoring procedures: Pass
- Requires narrative reports: Limited
- Conducts field audits: Limited
- May suspend future funding: Limited
- Requires financial reports: Limited
- Conducts site visits: Limited
- Requires grant agreements: Limited
- May require repayment: Limited
- Grant itemization coverage: 92.3%; rating input score 92; 40th percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Limited
- Related-party transparency: Limited
Accountability
- Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
- Governance controls: 2 of 7 controls in place; rating input score 29
- Conflict-of-interest policy: Fail
- Whistleblower policy: Fail
- Document-retention policy: Fail
- CEO compensation review process: NotApplicable
- Other executive compensation review process: NotApplicable
- Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
- Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
- Audit committee oversight: Missing
- Independent financial-statement audit: Fail
Sustainability
- Operating margin: 33.9%; rating input score 86; 86th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 3.01; rating input score 75; 75th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.02; rating input score 61; 61st percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 81; 81st percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: 25.5% per year; rating input score 100; 87th percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: 20.4% per year; rating input score 100; 86th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 16.5% per year; rating input score 100; 76th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- What they do: 1 programs and campaigns described on the official site
- Where the money goes: 66.2% of revenue deployed · 99.4% of spending went to programs
- Governance: 3 of 3 board members independent · 2 of 7 filing controls reported
- Programs: 1 filed program accomplishment · $998K in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 3 people listed
- Consistency: 24 of 26 current checks pass · 2 findings to review
- Schedules: 6 filed schedules · includes foreign activity
- Filing history: 11 filing years from 2010 to 2024
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: 2 filed money-flow records
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- High — Accountability: Governance controls: 4 of 6 not reported.
- Moderate — Transparency & Controls: Schedule A contributions reconciliation did not reconcile in the filed values.
- Review — Transparency & Controls: Foreign grant itemization did not reconcile in the filed values.