Springville Community Club of Tulare County Inc

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
770283271
IRS 990-EZ coverage
2015–2025
Forms available
Form 990-EZ 2025
Location
Springville, CA, USA
Phone
5595393993
Rating
86
Verdict
STRONG
Rating confidence
Moderate
Sector
Community Recreational Centers

Reported finances

Revenue
$34,099
Expenses
$43,250
Assets
$143,403
Liabilities
$952

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

7 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • DENIECE MC ARTHUR (President)

People named in this filing

  • PHYLLIS TAYLOR (Treasurer)
  • DENIECE MC ARTHUR (President)
  • DONNA MOORE (PARLIAMENTARIAN)

Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

Community betterment and operate a thrift shop staffed by volunteers primarily for the benefit of low income families

What it reported doing in 2025

Operates a thrift and gift shop, staffed by volunteers, which is utilized by the community and beneficial to low income families. Sponsor of the apple festival in october with over 200 vendors coming from many states selling handcrafted items. It is the biggest fundraiser not only for the community club but for most clubs in the community. It sells springville t-shirts, holds a book talk tea, free ice cream social and free concerts in the park. It supports the springville library and all proceeds of the events are combined and given back to the community as special donations and scholarships.

Operating model

Revenue model
Cannot be determined from the filing. The filing does not provide enough consistent revenue detail to tell how this nonprofit funds its work.
Distribution model
Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.

The verdict

STRONG - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Program spending has declined or grown slowly and revenue has declined or grown slowly.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 100
  • Transparency & Controls: 82
  • Sustainability: 40
  • Growth: 20

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 100%; rating input score 100
  • Program expense ratio: 100%; rating input score 100

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 51st percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Limited

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: -26.8%; rating input score 18; 18th percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 3.32; rating input score 76; 76th percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.01; rating input score 26; 26th percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 56; 56th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: -5.4% per year; rating input score 0; 35th percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: -4.7% per year; rating input score 0; 34th percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: 0.4% per year; rating input score 100; 39th percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 100% of revenue deployed · 100% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: Filed governance answers
  • Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment · $43K in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 7 people listed
  • Consistency: 7 of 7 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 1 filed schedules
  • Filing history: 11 filing years from 2015 to 2025
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • High — Growth: Program expense growth scored 0/100.
  • High — Growth: Revenue growth scored 0/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 18/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 26/100.
  • Review — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 56/100.